Active Users:801 Time:20/10/2026 05:12:27 AM
Re: Yes. saidarisnowtainted Send a noteboard - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM
I havent finished ToM (250 pages in) so maybe the answer to my question is somewhere ahead, but knowing that Graendal was "responsible" is making me itch with impatience--

Basically, do we now know how she fit RJ's criteria? Namely what has driven me bonkers has been the "how" PLUS "where" = final death.

Is there an answer as to how and where Asmo died?

How: Graendal killed him.

Where: In the pantry (probably, based on the lack of any creativity behind this 'mystery' ).

c'mon. what i'm talking about is the big deal that RJ made of the fact that Asmo's death was made final by virtue of how he died and where he died.

You mean that explanation wasn't good enough for you? Who do you think you are, saidarisnowtainted? :angry:



Arggggghh! What i'm trying to ask is can anybody explain the manner in which Asmo's death was final due to the combination of "how" AND "where" he died? How did he die and where did he die to cause this result? How did Graendal satisfy this criterion?
Reply to message
Explaining Asmo - ToM SPOILERS - 04/11/2010 06:08:54 PM 1652 Views
Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:12:21 PM 1411 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:17:51 PM 1161 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:16 PM 1204 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:34:42 PM 974 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:42:05 PM 1255 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:00:42 PM 973 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:31:18 PM 1159 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:29:23 PM 964 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:40:08 PM 998 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:43:02 PM 1080 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:47:44 PM 974 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 06:55:01 PM 1027 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:24:53 PM 942 Views
Re: Yes. - 04/11/2010 07:47:37 PM 865 Views
it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:16:53 PM 962 Views
Re: it is actually a combo of slayer and graendal theories: - 04/11/2010 07:23:39 PM 987 Views
Well, the prevalent pre-reveal theory was... - 06/11/2010 07:14:46 AM 1202 Views

Reply to Message