so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat
Apsalar Shadowdancer Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM
Boat sunk because balefire took out boatmen and part of the boat. Since it took out the boatmen, the boat is in position were it was minutes before, because the actions of boatmen moved the boat. Since it made a hole in the boat, the water filled it with amount it supposed to fill in these minutes.
this supports my side, you just agreed that the balefire but a hole in the boat at the same time the balefire burned the oarsmen back to, that is why the boat instantly fills with water, instead of filling with water after the transition. This shows that the parts of the boat that were hit with the balefire were taken out back in time, just like the boatsmen.
If it didn't do this the water would not start to fill the boat until the balefire event. While the boat moved back in the water, due to not being pushed by the boatmen, the holes in the boat would not exist before the balefire event.
again I'll quote the relevant line.
Because the slice from the boat's center had gone at the same time the boatmen had died, the river had had minutes to rush in.
This is directly from the text of the book. This is how balefire works. It directly states the the wood of the boat was removed from time to the same amount as the boatmen. I do not see how this can be taken any other way.
Please explain why you think what you do and provide some evidence to support your case. Otherwise you are just making crap up to fit your own interpretation.
I beleive it wouldn't, all it would do is to make a hole in the floor.
Yes, but WHY? your ignoring text, and quotes from Brandon Sanderson, without providing any evidence to support your view.
Prologue: A Question on Gateways
- 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM
1493 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM*
- 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM
390 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM*
- 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM
352 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities
- 25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM
876 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it
- 26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM
756 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions.
- 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM
862 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM*
- 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM
317 Views
thats not true
- 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM
803 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
- 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM
771 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
- 26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM
774 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is...
- 27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM
831 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it.
- 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM
753 Views
I don't agree
- 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM
857 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat
- 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM
852 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me
- 27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM
881 Views
A weave should be destroyed
- 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM
699 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely.
- 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM
855 Views