Active Users:322 Time:04/04/2025 12:31:09 AM
*nods* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM
And we've never seen any indication that balefire removes a weave or flows; that's what slicing and untying weaves are for.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1532 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 406 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 369 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 907 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 332 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 342 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 839 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 809 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 794 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 900 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 891 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 902 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 857 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 737 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 806 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 700 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 723 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 899 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 780 Views

Reply to Message