Active Users:1816 Time:23/01/2025 04:59:29 PM
*nods* RugbyPlayingAshaman Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM
And we've never seen any indication that balefire removes a weave or flows; that's what slicing and untying weaves are for.
"Those who think they have no time for bodily exercise will sooner or later have to find time for illness."
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1493 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 390 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 352 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 862 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 317 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 324 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 803 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 771 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 753 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 857 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 851 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 858 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 817 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 699 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 777 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 655 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 691 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 855 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 742 Views

Reply to Message