Active Users:612 Time:23/12/2024 05:49:27 AM
A weave should be destroyed Sidious Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM

However, I agree with you that there is no evidence to declare that balefire can or cannot affect a One Power weave, which is why I worded my previous response very carefully to indicate that it would not result in a temporal reversal, but I left out whether or not the targeted weave would be destroyed.


Rand wove a shield around himself when Osan'gar attacked him, and he said it would deflect everything except balefire.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1458 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 379 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 342 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 838 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 304 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 312 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 783 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 744 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 726 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 830 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 828 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 834 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 793 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 669 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 746 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 627 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 669 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 829 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 718 Views

Reply to Message