Active Users:458 Time:23/02/2025 05:34:26 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM
just replying to the statement that objects don't have threads

quoting from interviews

"Brandon: Everything has a thread, not just souls. Even a stone in a wall has a thread in the Pattern."

this was specifically the reply to a question abouot balefiring Graendal's palace.

you can check it out at theoryland's interview database. The quote is in the interview titled "The Gathering Storm Book Tour, Borders Dallas 14 November 2009 - Claireducky reporting"
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways Night Walker - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1519 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* Sidious - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 403 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* Night Walker - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 365 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities Sidious - 25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM 900 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it darius_sedai - 26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM 780 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. TaskmasterJack - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 895 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* newyorkersedai - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 329 Views
*nods* *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 337 Views
thats not true Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 825 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. TaskmasterJack - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 797 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. car'a'aman - 26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM 802 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is... TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM 863 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 782 Views
I don't agree Skeeve the Great - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 889 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 877 Views
Re: Balefire TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 887 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. Apsalar Shadowdancer - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 845 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM 901 Views
A weave should be destroyed Sidious - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 725 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed Skeeve the Great - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 796 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 685 Views
I agree darius_sedai - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 713 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 883 Views
*nods* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 768 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes