Active Users:758 Time:22/12/2024 08:56:17 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM
just replying to the statement that objects don't have threads

quoting from interviews

"Brandon: Everything has a thread, not just souls. Even a stone in a wall has a thread in the Pattern."

this was specifically the reply to a question abouot balefiring Graendal's palace.

you can check it out at theoryland's interview database. The quote is in the interview titled "The Gathering Storm Book Tour, Borders Dallas 14 November 2009 - Claireducky reporting"
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways Night Walker - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1457 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* Sidious - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 379 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* Night Walker - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 341 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities Sidious - 25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM 853 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it darius_sedai - 26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM 724 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. TaskmasterJack - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 837 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* newyorkersedai - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 303 Views
*nods* *NM* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 312 Views
thats not true Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 782 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. TaskmasterJack - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 744 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. car'a'aman - 26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM 746 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is... TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM 801 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 726 Views
I don't agree Skeeve the Great - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 830 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat Apsalar Shadowdancer - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 827 Views
Re: Balefire TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 831 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. Apsalar Shadowdancer - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 792 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM 848 Views
A weave should be destroyed Sidious - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 668 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed Skeeve the Great - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 746 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 626 Views
I agree darius_sedai - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 669 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. TaskmasterJack - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 828 Views
*nods* RugbyPlayingAshaman - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 717 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes