Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
car'a'aman Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM
just replying to the statement that objects don't have threads
quoting from interviews
"Brandon: Everything has a thread, not just souls. Even a stone in a wall has a thread in the Pattern."
this was specifically the reply to a question abouot balefiring Graendal's palace.
you can check it out at theoryland's interview database. The quote is in the interview titled "The Gathering Storm Book Tour, Borders Dallas 14 November 2009 - Claireducky reporting"
quoting from interviews
"Brandon: Everything has a thread, not just souls. Even a stone in a wall has a thread in the Pattern."
this was specifically the reply to a question abouot balefiring Graendal's palace.
you can check it out at theoryland's interview database. The quote is in the interview titled "The Gathering Storm Book Tour, Borders Dallas 14 November 2009 - Claireducky reporting"
Write drunk, revise sober.*MySmiley*
Prologue: A Question on Gateways
25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM
- 1492 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM*
25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM
- 389 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM*
25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM
- 352 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities
25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM
- 875 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it
26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM
- 755 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions.
25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM
- 862 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM*
25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM
- 316 Views
thats not true
26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM
- 803 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM
- 770 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM
- 774 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is...
27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM
- 830 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it.
26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM
- 753 Views
I don't agree
26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM
- 855 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat
26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM
- 851 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me
27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM
- 880 Views
A weave should be destroyed
26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM
- 698 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely.
27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM
- 855 Views