It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM
Explaining the boat incident is an issue that is confusing and hard to clarify. But the circumstances result from the threads of the boatmen being burned back combined with the damage to the boat, but NOT because the thread of the boat burned backwards, because it hasn't one.
Here's a test situation: If you shoot someone with an arrow through the head and then balefire the floor beneath their dead body... Did the floor vanish before the arrow hit them and thus allow them to fall below the arrow's path, meaning they are now alive? I personally do not believe this to be so. The person is still dead with the arrow through their head. If you believe it reverses the victim's fate, then we do indeed view the mechanics of balefire completely differently. Because I don't believe that balefiring the floor, arrow or bow after the event occurred will undo the death, but balefiring the archer would do so.
However, I agree with you that there is no evidence to declare that balefire can or cannot affect a One Power weave, which is why I worded my previous response very carefully to indicate that it would not result in a temporal reversal, but I left out whether or not the targeted weave would be destroyed.
Here's a test situation: If you shoot someone with an arrow through the head and then balefire the floor beneath their dead body... Did the floor vanish before the arrow hit them and thus allow them to fall below the arrow's path, meaning they are now alive? I personally do not believe this to be so. The person is still dead with the arrow through their head. If you believe it reverses the victim's fate, then we do indeed view the mechanics of balefire completely differently. Because I don't believe that balefiring the floor, arrow or bow after the event occurred will undo the death, but balefiring the archer would do so.
However, I agree with you that there is no evidence to declare that balefire can or cannot affect a One Power weave, which is why I worded my previous response very carefully to indicate that it would not result in a temporal reversal, but I left out whether or not the targeted weave would be destroyed.
This message last edited by TaskmasterJack on 26/10/2010 at 02:01:45 AM
Prologue: A Question on Gateways
25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM
- 1442 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM*
25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM
- 375 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM*
25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM
- 338 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities
25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM
- 846 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it
26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM
- 717 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions.
25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM
- 827 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM*
25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM
- 299 Views
thats not true
26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM
- 772 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM
- 736 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM
- 732 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is...
27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM
- 790 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it.
26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM
- 715 Views
I don't agree
26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM
- 818 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat
26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM
- 814 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me
27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM
- 836 Views
A weave should be destroyed
26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM
- 658 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely.
27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM
- 814 Views