Active Users:1191 Time:22/11/2024 10:40:21 PM
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM
Explaining the boat incident is an issue that is confusing and hard to clarify. But the circumstances result from the threads of the boatmen being burned back combined with the damage to the boat, but NOT because the thread of the boat burned backwards, because it hasn't one.

Here's a test situation: If you shoot someone with an arrow through the head and then balefire the floor beneath their dead body... Did the floor vanish before the arrow hit them and thus allow them to fall below the arrow's path, meaning they are now alive? I personally do not believe this to be so. The person is still dead with the arrow through their head. If you believe it reverses the victim's fate, then we do indeed view the mechanics of balefire completely differently. Because I don't believe that balefiring the floor, arrow or bow after the event occurred will undo the death, but balefiring the archer would do so.

However, I agree with you that there is no evidence to declare that balefire can or cannot affect a One Power weave, which is why I worded my previous response very carefully to indicate that it would not result in a temporal reversal, but I left out whether or not the targeted weave would be destroyed.
This message last edited by TaskmasterJack on 26/10/2010 at 02:01:45 AM
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1442 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 375 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 338 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 827 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 299 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 309 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 772 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 736 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 715 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 818 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 814 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 822 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 779 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 658 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 732 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 614 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 656 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 814 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 700 Views

Reply to Message