Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions.
TaskmasterJack Send a noteboard - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM
It burns their thread backward, undoing whatever that person has recently done. Probably only Jordan could have answered (and he may have, but I've never read of it) what level of intelligence the living things must possess to have their actions undone. Rand undoes the actions of Darkhounds, so there's some evidence it works beyond just for people. I would assume you could also balefire a dog who shit on your carpet to suddenly have a clean carpet as well. But could you balefire a mosquito to keep from getting an itchy bump?
My little tangent aside... I re-iterate: non-living things, including inanimate objects and one-power weaves, can not affect time by being balefired.
My little tangent aside... I re-iterate: non-living things, including inanimate objects and one-power weaves, can not affect time by being balefired.
Prologue: A Question on Gateways
25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM
- 1442 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM*
25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM
- 375 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM*
25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM
- 338 Views
I'm inclined to agree, but there are other possibilities
25/10/2010 08:48:01 PM
- 846 Views
Seems pretty obvious to me that she released it (and was holding it) before the BF hit it
26/10/2010 04:40:04 AM
- 717 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions.
25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM
- 827 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM*
25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM
- 299 Views
thats not true
26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM
- 772 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM
- 735 Views
Re: It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire.
26/10/2010 04:55:20 AM
- 732 Views
This will sound bad to say and I realize it sounds more petulant than it is...
27/10/2010 02:31:33 AM
- 790 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it.
26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM
- 715 Views
I don't agree
26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM
- 818 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat
26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM
- 814 Views
sceen=scene, yes? And I didn't mean confusing to me. I meant to others. It's always been clear to me
27/10/2010 02:51:41 AM
- 836 Views
A weave should be destroyed
26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM
- 657 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely.
27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM
- 814 Views