Active Users:1673 Time:23/01/2025 04:48:37 PM
Prologue: A Question on Gateways Night Walker Send a noteboard - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM
I should say first that I haven’t read it. Also this may have been covered in other thread that I missed but it just came to me and thought to ask everyone.

My question, how come Graendal’s Gateway weave isn’t destroyed by Rand’s Balefire? Shouldn't the weave have been wiped out, thus never opening in the first place, or do the temporal properties of Balefire only work on non-power things?
This message last edited by Night Walker on 25/10/2010 at 08:37:32 PM
Reply to message
Prologue: A Question on Gateways - 25/10/2010 07:33:23 PM 1493 Views
I was wondering this myself *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:23:57 PM 389 Views
I'm thinking it got overlooked... *NM* - 25/10/2010 08:35:31 PM 352 Views
Balefire's reversal of actions taken only works on living things that can perform said actions. - 25/10/2010 09:36:46 PM 862 Views
Agreed. I think Graendal's weave is only undone if the BF hits her, not the gateway *NM* - 25/10/2010 10:48:07 PM 317 Views
*nods* *NM* - 26/10/2010 05:08:20 PM 324 Views
thats not true - 26/10/2010 01:18:16 AM 803 Views
It is true. Objects do not have threads that can be affected by balefire. - 26/10/2010 01:56:48 AM 770 Views
here is the quote from the sceen, it is not confusing, you were just to lazy to read it. - 26/10/2010 07:24:19 AM 753 Views
I don't agree - 26/10/2010 12:08:41 PM 856 Views
so you think it made the hole in the boat back in time to allow the water into the boat - 26/10/2010 06:25:37 PM 851 Views
Re: Balefire - 27/10/2010 03:02:39 AM 858 Views
we will just have to agree to disagree then. - 27/10/2010 03:51:41 AM 817 Views
A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 10:19:13 AM 699 Views
Re: A weave should be destroyed - 26/10/2010 12:03:16 PM 776 Views
That has more to do with the nature of both weaves - 26/10/2010 05:07:48 PM 654 Views
I agree - 26/10/2010 05:32:57 PM 691 Views
Thank you for reminding us of the scene, but it doesn't sell me completely. - 27/10/2010 02:28:00 AM 855 Views
*nods* - 26/10/2010 05:05:12 PM 741 Views

Reply to Message