Active Users:1106 Time:22/11/2024 09:15:08 PM
Which were their ages before they swore. Great Lord of Chaos Send a noteboard - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM
Seriously though we know that's not the case as Siuan and Leanne both reverted back to "prime child bearing year" when they were Stilled


Would it be the same for someone like Verin, or hell, Cadsuane?
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Reply to message
Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 01/10/2010 07:23:43 AM 995 Views
wouldn't surprise me - 01/10/2010 08:26:49 AM 550 Views
It's more the overall culture of the AS, I think - 01/10/2010 09:12:25 AM 717 Views
agreed *NM* - 01/10/2010 10:01:21 AM 215 Views
*nods* - 01/10/2010 11:29:35 AM 632 Views
More or less agree, but with some corrections - 01/10/2010 01:34:13 PM 686 Views
BUT this didnt stop Aes Sedai in the AoL - 01/10/2010 02:58:22 PM 744 Views
Almost none of those reasons applied in the AoL, so what's your point? - 01/10/2010 03:20:59 PM 509 Views
Point is - 01/10/2010 03:33:41 PM 466 Views
The answer is very simple. The WT discourages AS from having families as it distracts for being AS - 03/10/2010 01:08:30 AM 493 Views
OTOH, maybe they're all just post-menopausal *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:53:34 AM 239 Views
I hope they all had good hormones... Try and imagine 1000 women going through the "change" at once - 03/10/2010 04:12:57 PM 442 Views
Which were their ages before they swore. - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM 471 Views
Let's not forget that a pregnant woman has trouble channelling. - 01/10/2010 02:18:12 PM 478 Views
Re: What about male children with the spark - 03/10/2010 12:34:42 PM 505 Views
Re: Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 05/10/2010 06:35:57 PM 492 Views
Interesting...but no. - 06/10/2010 01:58:28 PM 552 Views
no but your questions do *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:38:41 PM 213 Views
I dunno, I think I got wood. No, wait... Its Rigor Mortis. (sorry, too funny to keep to myself) *NM* - 11/10/2010 01:32:17 AM 207 Views
"it's dead jim" *NM* - 12/10/2010 01:45:44 PM 220 Views

Reply to Message