Active Users:343 Time:09/04/2025 09:41:27 AM
Which were their ages before they swore. Great Lord of Chaos Send a noteboard - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM
Seriously though we know that's not the case as Siuan and Leanne both reverted back to "prime child bearing year" when they were Stilled


Would it be the same for someone like Verin, or hell, Cadsuane?
Ὦ ξεῖν', ἀγγέλλειν Λακεδαιμονίοις ὅτι τῇδε
κείμεθα, τοῖς κείνων ῥήμασι πειθόμενοι.
Reply to message
Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 01/10/2010 07:23:43 AM 1070 Views
wouldn't surprise me - 01/10/2010 08:26:49 AM 617 Views
It's more the overall culture of the AS, I think - 01/10/2010 09:12:25 AM 794 Views
agreed *NM* - 01/10/2010 10:01:21 AM 243 Views
*nods* - 01/10/2010 11:29:35 AM 708 Views
More or less agree, but with some corrections - 01/10/2010 01:34:13 PM 774 Views
BUT this didnt stop Aes Sedai in the AoL - 01/10/2010 02:58:22 PM 825 Views
Almost none of those reasons applied in the AoL, so what's your point? - 01/10/2010 03:20:59 PM 590 Views
Point is - 01/10/2010 03:33:41 PM 542 Views
The answer is very simple. The WT discourages AS from having families as it distracts for being AS - 03/10/2010 01:08:30 AM 572 Views
OTOH, maybe they're all just post-menopausal *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:53:34 AM 266 Views
I hope they all had good hormones... Try and imagine 1000 women going through the "change" at once - 03/10/2010 04:12:57 PM 510 Views
Which were their ages before they swore. - 11/10/2010 06:53:19 PM 549 Views
Let's not forget that a pregnant woman has trouble channelling. - 01/10/2010 02:18:12 PM 546 Views
Re: What about male children with the spark - 03/10/2010 12:34:42 PM 576 Views
Re: Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 05/10/2010 06:35:57 PM 553 Views
Interesting...but no. - 06/10/2010 01:58:28 PM 622 Views
no but your questions do *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:38:41 PM 243 Views
I dunno, I think I got wood. No, wait... Its Rigor Mortis. (sorry, too funny to keep to myself) *NM* - 11/10/2010 01:32:17 AM 233 Views
"it's dead jim" *NM* - 12/10/2010 01:45:44 PM 254 Views

Reply to Message