Active Users:1152 Time:22/11/2024 09:30:36 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Maybe the first, the second can't happen. malekithe Send a noteboard - 07/10/2010 07:29:36 AM
Uniting seems likely, except for Taim and his croneys, but will the men take the 3 oaths?

Egwene was brought around to it by Suian after she intended to remove the 3 oaths forever.

It would seem a very unfair advantage that men would remain un oathed and all AS would stay oathed.

Thoughts?

Because compulsion wtich the oath rod is doesn't work on men holding the Power.

Huh? Where did you get the idea that compulsion with the oath rod doesnt work on men holding the power? That's never happened before.

I believe Graendal thinks it when Sammael gates in to one of ther first meatings in the books, but I can’t remember which book that happens in right now so I’ll have to look for it tomorrow.


Idk, never saw oath rod + man in any scene I can remember and I cant see how a man wouldnt be affected
Reply to message
Will the Black Tower & White Tower unite & if so will men take the 3 oaths? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:27:19 AM 879 Views
Hopefully they all come to their senses and stop hamstringing themselves with dumb oaths Ava - 01/10/2010 08:21:26 AM 510 Views
Re: Hopefully they all come to their senses and stop hamstringing themselves with dumb oaths Voscaia Sedai - 01/10/2010 09:55:42 AM 448 Views
the oaths do more harm than good Ava - 01/10/2010 01:56:12 PM 452 Views
Re: Hopefully they all come to their senses and stop hamstringing themselves with dumb oaths malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:28:44 PM 428 Views
Re: Hopefully they all come to their senses and stop hamstringing themselves with dumb oaths Ava - 02/10/2010 05:23:06 AM 434 Views
Which is why they need to pull their heads outta their butts and ditch the oaths altogether! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 02/10/2010 11:00:22 AM 220 Views
Yes to the first, but hopefully no to the second. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:13:25 AM 468 Views
Hopefully no, and it seems like the themes point against it. Cannoli - 01/10/2010 12:30:16 PM 596 Views
Disagree w/ respect to the Towers unifying Marshall - 02/10/2010 07:05:09 PM 429 Views
And look what happened to the AoL Cannoli - 02/10/2010 09:44:35 PM 539 Views
Wow, you have a lot to say lol malekithe - 03/10/2010 08:12:57 AM 486 Views
Also keep in mind that the symbols of saidin and saidar are not the ying and yang symbols RugbyPlayingAshaman - 08/10/2010 04:28:50 PM 528 Views
And rightly so... MalkierKnight - 18/10/2010 05:28:39 AM 555 Views
Unify: yes, but not set themselves apart. Oaths: I don't think so. The Angry Druid - 07/10/2010 08:53:52 PM 445 Views
unite yes. if oaths then the men will have their own set. *NM* nigelgoboom - 03/10/2010 06:19:26 PM 216 Views
What oaths? malekithe - 04/10/2010 04:25:13 AM 442 Views
umm no nigelgoboom - 11/10/2010 01:25:35 PM 424 Views
Maybe the first, the second can't happen. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:45:10 AM 447 Views
Re: Maybe the first, the second can't happen. malekithe - 07/10/2010 06:27:02 AM 447 Views
Re: Maybe the first, the second can't happen. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 07:12:26 AM 444 Views
Re: Maybe the first, the second can't happen. malekithe - 07/10/2010 07:29:36 AM 413 Views
Sammael thinks that if he's holding the Power Graendal can't compel him darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 04:10:07 PM 464 Views
I hope not. And I think the 3 Oaths should go away, as well. RugbyPlayingAshaman - 08/10/2010 03:53:56 PM 417 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes