Because compulsion wtich the oath rods or doesn't work on men holding the Power. That's why the warder bond can't control Rand.
This message last edited by Dunstan on 07/10/2010 at 12:41:17 AM
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL?
01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM
- 895 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work
01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM
- 617 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it.
01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
- 500 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM
- 512 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM
- 509 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM
- 477 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker.
01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM
- 600 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different
01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM
- 477 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while.
01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM
- 460 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN?
01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
- 561 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM*
02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
- 197 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men?
02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM
- 481 Views
yes
04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM
- 536 Views
Re: yes
04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM
- 480 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women
05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM
- 487 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women
05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM
- 471 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM*
03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM
- 256 Views
Doubtful
07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM
- 490 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM*
07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM
- 246 Views