Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL?
- 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM
894 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work
- 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM
617 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. 
- 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
500 Views
- 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM
500 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
- 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM
511 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
- 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM
509 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again.
- 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM
476 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM*
- 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM
222 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker.
- 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM
600 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different
- 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM
477 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while.
- 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM
460 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN?
- 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM
560 Views
*NM*
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM*
- 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
196 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men?
- 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM
480 Views
yes
- 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM
536 Views
Re: yes
- 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM
480 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women
- 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM
487 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women
- 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM
470 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM*
- 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM
256 Views
Doubtful
- 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM
488 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM*
- 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM
246 Views