Active Users:329 Time:10/04/2025 06:43:02 AM
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM
And why would Sammael tell a lie that they could disprove without his help? All they would have had to do is induce Rand to swear and prove him wrong, which would be fatal to his hopes to use them to get control over Rand for his purposes. If he did think it might work on Rand, he would never have given them the Rod for the same reason Graendal preemptively refuses to train Someryn. At the least he would have hedged it with BS proscriptions and conditions like he told them for the "nar'baha." He could have told them something like "the feedback/backlash will kill anyone nearby" or something similar to dissuade them from trying it. He would not have chanced Rand ending up in the control of others who had ways of getting in touch with him.
Cannoli
“Tolerance is the virtue of the man without convictions.” GK Chesteron
Inde muagdhe Aes Sedai misain ye!
Deus Vult!
*MySmiley*
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 948 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 679 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 565 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 244 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 525 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 668 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 542 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 517 Views
At least they can feel the True Source - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 550 Views
All true. - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 611 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 617 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 217 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 223 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 257 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 221 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 540 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 627 Views
yes - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 599 Views
Re: yes - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 537 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 544 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 541 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 281 Views
Doubtful - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 542 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 266 Views
Maybe but. - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 538 Views
Re: Maybe but. - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 561 Views

Reply to Message