Active Users:1216 Time:23/11/2024 02:52:04 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim Send a noteboard - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM
It's meant to restrain women and force them to submit to certain restrictions on their lifestyles and choices. There's a REASON it's penis-shaped.
Human beings, who are almost unique in having the ability to learn from the experience of others, are also remarkable for their apparent disinclination to do so.
Reply to message
Could the Oath Rod have been used on tainted men in the AoL? malekithe - 01/10/2010 07:32:02 AM 895 Views
the oath rod requires comprehension to make it work Ava - 01/10/2010 08:18:58 AM 617 Views
Remind me some time to show you how to post something so long no one will read it. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:46:46 AM 500 Views
They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:23:27 AM 512 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. Datakim - 03/10/2010 02:12:43 AM 509 Views
Re: They could just be forced to take an oath to never touch the OP again. darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:53:46 AM 477 Views
why not just gentle them, then? *NM* Ava - 03/10/2010 06:46:03 AM 222 Views
Re: why not just gentle them, then? darius_sedai - 05/10/2010 04:49:38 AM 466 Views
My bet is it would just kill them quicker. Joel - 01/10/2010 09:49:25 AM 600 Views
that was two oaths in contradiction though, i think that's different Foxhead - 01/10/2010 10:06:08 AM 477 Views
Right, because they had the physical capacity to resist channeling, at least for a while. Joel - 01/10/2010 10:42:00 AM 460 Views
At least they can feel the True Source malekithe - 01/10/2010 03:08:03 PM 486 Views
All true. Joel - 01/10/2010 03:53:55 PM 552 Views
Did ANY of you recall that IT DOES NOT WORK ON MEN? Cannoli - 01/10/2010 11:43:34 AM 561 Views
LOL Good one! *NM* Ashaman_Luc - 01/10/2010 02:38:18 PM 193 Views
Some men might like it too *NM* Ava - 01/10/2010 02:41:11 PM 200 Views
Mmmmm Hmmmm! *NM* Evil_Monkey - 01/10/2010 09:09:21 PM 231 Views
just cause Sammael said that, doesn't make it true *NM* Jim - 02/10/2010 09:44:17 PM 197 Views
Do you REALLY think that with all the Tower's experiments on linking, they never tried it on men? Cannoli - 02/10/2010 10:11:11 PM 481 Views
No reason to believe there weren't Oath Rods made for men. darius_sedai - 03/10/2010 01:26:17 AM 563 Views
yes Jim - 04/10/2010 02:16:52 AM 536 Views
Re: yes Sidious - 04/10/2010 05:06:34 AM 480 Views
there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Jim - 05/10/2010 04:28:01 AM 487 Views
Re: there are several ter'angreal that work for both men and women Evil_Monkey - 05/10/2010 04:36:04 PM 471 Views
Surely there must have been male oath rods *NM* Rurouni_Kenshin - 03/10/2010 10:37:57 AM 256 Views
Doubtful Dunstan - 07/10/2010 12:40:52 AM 488 Views
No. Balthamel was threatened with binding in the AoL. There was a binder of some kind *NM* darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 01:35:23 AM 246 Views
Maybe but. Dunstan - 07/10/2010 01:48:53 AM 475 Views
Re: Maybe but. darius_sedai - 07/10/2010 02:22:05 PM 502 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Formatting
Smiley Codes