Active Users:1106 Time:22/11/2024 09:01:52 PM
wouldn't surprise me Ava Send a noteboard - 01/10/2010 08:26:49 AM
I've never thought about it before, but the oath rod was designed to stop criminals, and it would make sense in a way that they would also want to stop the criminals from procreating. Building something into the oath rod seems like a good and subtle way to do it.

OTOH, Myrelle and other green AS apparently get into all sorts of sexy shenanigans with their warders, so maybe they have the same appetites as everyone else but just have some sort of secret WOT birth control.
Reply to message
Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 01/10/2010 07:23:43 AM 995 Views
wouldn't surprise me - 01/10/2010 08:26:49 AM 550 Views
It's more the overall culture of the AS, I think - 01/10/2010 09:12:25 AM 716 Views
agreed *NM* - 01/10/2010 10:01:21 AM 215 Views
*nods* - 01/10/2010 11:29:35 AM 631 Views
More or less agree, but with some corrections - 01/10/2010 01:34:13 PM 686 Views
BUT this didnt stop Aes Sedai in the AoL - 01/10/2010 02:58:22 PM 743 Views
Almost none of those reasons applied in the AoL, so what's your point? - 01/10/2010 03:20:59 PM 509 Views
Point is - 01/10/2010 03:33:41 PM 466 Views
Let's not forget that a pregnant woman has trouble channelling. - 01/10/2010 02:18:12 PM 478 Views
Re: What about male children with the spark - 03/10/2010 12:34:42 PM 504 Views
Re: Does the Oath Rod destroy the urge to procreate? - 05/10/2010 06:35:57 PM 492 Views
Interesting...but no. - 06/10/2010 01:58:28 PM 552 Views
no but your questions do *NM* - 10/10/2010 05:38:41 PM 212 Views
I dunno, I think I got wood. No, wait... Its Rigor Mortis. (sorry, too funny to keep to myself) *NM* - 11/10/2010 01:32:17 AM 206 Views
"it's dead jim" *NM* - 12/10/2010 01:45:44 PM 220 Views

Reply to Message