Active Users:584 Time:18/12/2024 06:09:00 PM
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? malekithe Send a noteboard - 30/09/2010 10:13:25 PM
As far as we know the oath rod is infallible. Is it though? Perhaps an oath limits ones methods are more reliable than one that completely voids the possibility. The oath against lying does not stop one from being deceptive. The oath against using the one power as a weapon and even the one against the creation of weapons both have exceptions. I would believe there was a reason for this. In fact, the only oaths we have that leave no choices to the bound person are Galina's oath of obedience and she is devoid of any will to fight against it.


What is the loophole in the oath against creating weapons? Do you mean "for one man to kill another"? And thus they can make it for one man to kill a woman, one woman to kill a man, or one woman to kill women etc etc etc?

I think the Dark oath loophole is a plot contrivance for Verin's scene because we never knew what the dark oaths were before that moment.

However Aes Sedai being Aes Sedai it stands to reason that whoever instituted the oaths should have realized they could wiggle out of it in a hundred different methods and used something like the oaths of obedience that the Sitters used on the BA and Therava used on Galina
Reply to message
Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 29/09/2010 08:35:55 AM 1218 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 29/09/2010 11:52:10 AM 774 Views
That makes no sense. - 29/09/2010 02:28:33 PM 706 Views
Squeeze an item too hard, and it will find a way to escape. - 29/09/2010 05:54:50 PM 702 Views
It's poetic. *NM* - 29/09/2010 11:59:05 AM 285 Views
The Forsaken that created the Oaths in the first place must have messed up - 29/09/2010 03:14:30 PM 715 Views
Most likely - 29/09/2010 05:43:38 PM 800 Views
Although given how we know Oaths work, they wouldn't have to die. - 29/09/2010 09:55:22 PM 610 Views
Good point. I didn't look at it that way. *NM* - 30/09/2010 01:39:33 AM 344 Views
It's really, really stupid - 29/09/2010 09:58:51 PM 639 Views
As with many previous similar debates regarding the Shadow - 29/09/2010 10:18:03 PM 620 Views
Jordan needed it this way to be able to write the deeply moving Verin confession scene - 29/09/2010 10:39:22 PM 654 Views
LOL *NM* - 30/09/2010 04:16:35 PM 260 Views
it's not so much that they are dumb... they just have no common sense! - 30/09/2010 05:57:03 PM 657 Views
It's less stupid than you think - 29/09/2010 11:51:34 PM 677 Views
With the Black Ajah, you either agree to join, or you're murdered - 01/10/2010 10:16:41 PM 571 Views
Translation error - 30/09/2010 01:02:06 AM 731 Views
This would be awesome if true. Unfortunately, I don't think it is - 01/10/2010 10:20:20 PM 555 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 30/09/2010 04:20:05 PM 671 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 30/09/2010 10:13:25 PM 628 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 30/09/2010 10:38:11 PM 643 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths? - 30/09/2010 11:52:40 PM 618 Views
Because no one is perfect. - 01/10/2010 03:06:14 AM 531 Views
Padan Fain wasn't a mistake. - 01/10/2010 03:56:28 AM 593 Views
Sure he was. - 01/10/2010 05:22:09 AM 583 Views
Re: Sure he was. - 01/10/2010 06:39:26 AM 576 Views
Ignorance of the law is no excuse. - 01/10/2010 07:13:03 AM 577 Views
I always hate that saying..ignorance is bliss! So it should be a valid excuse! - 01/10/2010 07:36:52 AM 587 Views
Happiness is also not an excuse. - 01/10/2010 09:32:18 AM 540 Views
That's not a mistake, that's bad luck (Yay for the Pattern ) - 01/10/2010 03:48:32 PM 621 Views
It was a calculated risk, but the wrong bet. - 01/10/2010 03:57:32 PM 562 Views

Reply to Message