Why would he put a clause in that allows people to blab, when they otherwise couldn't, so that he can tell if they blabbed and counter it?
A better "counter" would be to not allow it in the first place.
A better "counter" would be to not allow it in the first place.
A little learning is a dangerous thing.
Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths?
29/09/2010 08:35:55 AM
- 1218 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths?
29/09/2010 11:52:10 AM
- 774 Views
That makes no sense.
29/09/2010 02:28:33 PM
- 707 Views
As far as we know, they're just regular Oath Rod oaths. There's no surveillance
29/09/2010 09:50:16 PM
- 648 Views
It's poetic. *NM*
29/09/2010 11:59:05 AM
- 285 Views
agreed. "The hour of my death" sounds more threatening and foreboding. *NM*
29/09/2010 09:33:38 PM
- 277 Views
The Forsaken that created the Oaths in the first place must have messed up
29/09/2010 03:14:30 PM
- 715 Views
Most likely
29/09/2010 05:43:38 PM
- 800 Views
Although given how we know Oaths work, they wouldn't have to die.
29/09/2010 09:55:22 PM
- 611 Views
It's really, really stupid
29/09/2010 09:58:51 PM
- 640 Views
As with many previous similar debates regarding the Shadow
29/09/2010 10:18:03 PM
- 621 Views
Hah, Either they're SO SMART we just don't realize it... or they're idiots
01/10/2010 10:11:42 PM
- 550 Views
Jordan needed it this way to be able to write the deeply moving Verin confession scene
29/09/2010 10:39:22 PM
- 655 Views
it's not so much that they are dumb... they just have no common sense!
30/09/2010 05:57:03 PM
- 657 Views
It's less stupid than you think
29/09/2010 11:51:34 PM
- 677 Views
With the Black Ajah, you either agree to join, or you're murdered
01/10/2010 10:16:41 PM
- 571 Views
Translation error
30/09/2010 01:02:06 AM
- 731 Views
This would be awesome if true. Unfortunately, I don't think it is
01/10/2010 10:20:20 PM
- 555 Views
Re: Why is there a loophole in the Dark Oaths?
30/09/2010 04:20:05 PM
- 671 Views
Because no one is perfect.
01/10/2010 03:06:14 AM
- 531 Views
Padan Fain wasn't a mistake.
01/10/2010 03:56:28 AM
- 593 Views
Sure he was.
01/10/2010 05:22:09 AM
- 584 Views
Re: Sure he was.
01/10/2010 06:39:26 AM
- 576 Views
Ignorance of the law is no excuse.
01/10/2010 07:13:03 AM
- 578 Views
I always hate that saying..ignorance is bliss! So it should be a valid excuse!
01/10/2010 07:36:52 AM
- 587 Views