Active Users:1092 Time:22/11/2024 11:09:23 PM
Not true indeed... and.... DomA Send a noteboard - 28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM
Foretellings have yet to happen out of order, or to refer to many different and totally unconnected things at once.

We just have to look at the KC prophecies for this. Elements of a foretelling are related to one another, and so far they've always been chronological. KC, Lydia's, Elaida's etc. They're all the same.

(Side note: it seems Elaida's foretellings could all be pretty much related to the same "event": the world coming to its blackest and tears being wept, and Rand standing in the middle of it all, the Royal Line of Andor being key to the LB, the BT events... It might be Elaida, who is a weak foreteller, might have ever foretold only about a fairly limited timeline...)

Elaida's last foretelling has just started to be fulfilled (and I'm starting to find it quite interesting that Jordan kind of made a point that Mesaana knows this foretelling to the word because Alviarin reported it to her, and Alviarin memorizes the exact words... and Mesaana won't have forgotten.. and she said this wouldn't come clear anyway until it has passed... but the problem is, the first part would now be crystal clear to Mesaana, and she can now puzzle out more of what is about come, and use it... Quite an interesting find this, I think ):

The White Tower will be whole again, except for remnants cast out and scorned, whole and stronger than ever.

This has taken place in TGS, mere days before Rand and Egwene meet... it shouldn't be a surprise this comes right next in their storyline (I was sure this was coming soon in their story line, I just didn't expect Rand and Egwene to appear right at the beginning of TOM, for timeline issues):


Rand al'Thor will face the Amyrlin Seat and know her anger.

She has a big issue over which to become really angry with Rand at this juncture, if she asks him if he knows what is delaying her envoys to his people, sent at his invitation, and why they no longer communicate with her (and it doesn't help that this is becoming a pattern with Rand as far as Egwene can judge... when AS are sent his way - coming in peace or hostile, they vanish without a word... and they tend to reappear mysteriously "serving" Rand after a while...), and he admits to her he may just have made a terrible mistake to send her people to Taim... It's a solid mess Rand made there. Will he decide it's time to visit Taim at the BT and see with his own eyes next, and be told by Taim no envoys from the WT ever came, and some BS about Logain? Possibly.

Will Mesaana, having puzzled out what the Foretelling is about, interfere with what comes next? Quite possibly... I would certainly forewarn Taim or plan a way to use this to her advantage if I had seen the first part of the foretelling ruining my plans...

That the BT is the issue Rand and Egwene will discuss in their first meeting is foretold by what comes next in the foretelling, which is forcibly related, because it's part of the same prophecy:

The Black Tower will be rent in blood and fire, and sisters will walk its grounds.

So, Rand and Egwene's conversation will become heated, but one way or another it will lead to the BT being rented in blood and fire, and sisters walking its ground.

Foretelling aren't a bit here, a bit there. They form wholes.

The "sisters walking its ground" aren't any sisters nor do they walk the premises at any time. This is the ending. The ground they walk will be what's left of the BT once it's been rent in blood and fire. Razed to the ground, quite possibly.

This foretelling appears to be completely unconnected to the meeting of Egwene and Rand, with Nynaeve present and a Seanchan woman. That, IMO, is for much, much later (probably part of the "same" red herring that lead us to believe the Seanchan attack on the Tower would result in an alliance between Egwene and a Seanchan... which we know now was totally unrelated...)


It sounds to me more and more likely Elaida's foretelling will finish to be fulfilled in TOM around the same time Nicola's foretelling will start being fulfilled (again... chronologically):

The lion sword, the dedicated spear, she who sees beyond. Three on the boat, and he who is dead yet lives.

Will most likely happen at the end of TOM, after the big battle that starts TG, and from there spark many, many more battles to come before it's over:

The great battle done, but the world not done with battle.

Then, it appears the Seanchan conflict won't be resolved just yet:

The land divided by the return

However, the major alliance that reunites the Aes Sedai male and female as TG starts very likely ends TOM, much like the reunification of the Tower ended TGS:

and the guardians balance the servants.

As for this:

The future teeters on the edge of a blade.

I think this line heralds the beginning of the Last Battle, and probably foretells that the Light won't exactly have a great victory in that "great battle". Not only the world form there is in serious jeopardy, but this appears to be a reference to the fact the LB has come, and now everything hangs on Three as One and a Blade of Light. This refers to the Callandor (Rand + two women) (or as prefer myself: Justice, Rand, Mat and Perrin) prophecy. One of the "endgame" prophecies as I started calling it a while ago.


We might have quite a bit of the picture in this:

- Rand and Egwene meet early (on their timeline, anyway). She is angry. It has to do with the BT.

- The BT will face blood and fire (battle). Sisters will walk the ground after the battle.

- Rand will be "he who is dead yet lives" at the climax of the book, after a "great battle"

- The Seanchan conflict won't be solved, in fact the division might deepen, and it becomes really quite important.

- The Last Battle starts, the fate of the world is in jeopardy, and a final reminder that at the end all will hang on the edge of a certain blade...

(I guess Cadsuane might bring Callandor back to Rand when they next meet, and this might happen at the end of TOM. I still think this is a "red herring" blade and the blade Rand has to use at the LB will be Justice, but we'll see). If something bad is to happen to Callandor (fall in the hands of Demandred - that'd be a good plot twist that... or be destroyed as a red herring that all is lost as TG starts... the end of TOM would be a good time for this to happen...).

Hmmm... I can't recall what happens to Excalibur when Arthur died at the Battle of Camlann...
This message last edited by DomA on 28/09/2010 at 02:36:52 AM
Reply to message
Jason's review... Looks like DomA was right (Review is now removed) - 25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM 3423 Views
Re: Jason's review (spoilerish thoughts from me, so BEWARE!). Looks like DomA was right - 25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM 1248 Views
Pretty sure it's not Egwene... - 25/09/2010 07:07:00 AM 1179 Views
Oh well - I was wrong - 27/09/2010 03:56:59 PM 889 Views
Ituralde - 25/09/2010 06:29:26 AM 1010 Views
Read the ToM rules - 25/09/2010 07:44:22 AM 932 Views
I officially hate reviews of WoT (in general) - 25/09/2010 08:10:43 AM 1009 Views
I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 09:45:10 AM 1076 Views
Re: I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 03:50:40 PM 918 Views
Perrin will probably gather the wolves... - 25/09/2010 09:57:06 AM 1067 Views
I suppose Olver could be the one who takes off Mat's eye *NM* - 25/09/2010 10:01:17 AM 492 Views
The review is now gone. *NM* - 25/09/2010 04:10:59 PM 501 Views
Unfortunately, there's not much left for Elayne to do. - 25/09/2010 07:14:09 PM 1111 Views
I haven't read the review but... - 25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM 1499 Views
That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 08:25:42 PM 1096 Views
It's odd, I didn't see any reference to Rand descending from DM in his review. - 25/09/2010 08:39:33 PM 935 Views
It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 08:55:49 PM 1035 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:03:14 PM 921 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:54:28 PM 905 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 10:09:58 PM 1168 Views
Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 25/09/2010 10:46:23 PM 1004 Views
Re: Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 26/09/2010 01:11:52 AM 1004 Views
I blame JordanCon too. - 26/09/2010 02:17:50 AM 1062 Views
Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 26/09/2010 10:04:40 PM 977 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 07:20:11 AM 962 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 11:03:35 AM 976 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 01:07:59 AM 1044 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 07:35:04 AM 1006 Views
Re: That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 09:49:17 PM 1204 Views
Some thoughts on a potential meeting... - 26/09/2010 05:11:06 AM 1119 Views
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines... - 25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM 1063 Views
To me it's two different things - 26/09/2010 01:48:13 AM 1154 Views
I agree - 26/09/2010 03:09:04 AM 954 Views
My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 03:50:36 AM 1026 Views
Re: My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 11:42:12 PM 1218 Views
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM 959 Views
Re: KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 09:35:41 PM 1088 Views
Whose really to blame though? - 27/09/2010 03:43:30 AM 939 Views
A suggestion? - 26/09/2010 11:39:08 AM 1088 Views
Is there a copy of the review somewhere? *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:40:22 AM 578 Views
The review is back up... - 27/09/2010 01:59:50 AM 935 Views
It wasn't quite identical... It was missing the line about Rand walking down from DM - 27/09/2010 06:42:47 AM 938 Views
The line about Rand wasn't there when I read the review Saturday morning either. *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:57:00 PM 428 Views
It was... - 27/09/2010 04:22:24 PM 792 Views
I must have missed it then. It does fit with Tor's not releasing Chapter 1 early. *NM* - 27/09/2010 05:06:36 PM 439 Views
What do you mean? - 27/09/2010 11:33:15 PM 847 Views
It was at the very bottom of the post and hard to find - 28/09/2010 12:44:56 AM 740 Views
Olver - 27/09/2010 11:34:40 AM 1088 Views
He's Demandred, natch. - 27/09/2010 03:54:09 PM 835 Views
Re: Olver - 27/09/2010 05:42:25 PM 888 Views
Re: Olver darkfriend? - 28/09/2010 12:02:11 AM 947 Views
'Tis a shame. I love spoilers. - 27/09/2010 03:16:02 PM 953 Views
One problem with the idea of a Rand-Egwene meeting in Chapter 1 beyond timeline issues - 27/09/2010 10:29:15 PM 870 Views
Not true... - 28/09/2010 01:00:40 AM 859 Views
Good call. I assumed, and still do, that the two events are one in the same. - 28/09/2010 01:10:13 AM 938 Views
I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 01:47:40 AM 787 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 02:00:59 AM 846 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 03:07:08 AM 1679 Views
Not true indeed... and.... - 28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM 1096 Views
Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 28/09/2010 03:31:24 AM 825 Views
Re: Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 13/10/2010 01:32:12 AM 1158 Views

Reply to Message