As for the infamous top 6 Forsaken - well - their positions combined great political and great physical ability, and Lews Therin himself has freely stated that Graendal's manipulative abilities are supposedly unmatched among the Forsaken, so that would surely compensate for her lesser face to face "Battle strength" among the strongest males.
She is strong enough to make the result of a contest at least contain a small element of doubt. But she would be more likely than not to lose, if the battle was against the most formiddable Forsaken channelers:
Ishamael, Demandred, Lanfear, Sammael and Rahvin.
Aginor / Osan'gar / Dashiva is second only to Ishamael in male strength IIRC. He just is not into battle, but he has a vast amount of raw strength, so just comparing strength he has to be in top tier.
One Power Battle ability...
27/09/2010 11:11:33 PM
- 1347 Views
You forgot about Aginor / Osan'gar / Dashiva
28/09/2010 12:10:17 AM
- 603 Views
I tire of this idiocy...
28/09/2010 01:02:17 AM
- 691 Views
Wow... talk about a long string of erroneous conclusions
28/09/2010 07:41:49 AM
- 727 Views
Interesting...
28/09/2010 08:14:14 AM
- 648 Views
Re: Interesting...
28/09/2010 11:48:16 AM
- 611 Views
Wow, Sidious!
28/09/2010 05:41:14 PM
- 491 Views
Re: Wow, Sidious!
28/09/2010 06:22:41 PM
- 473 Views
With respect, your and Fionwe's rantings are based largely on opinion as well - more so than mine...
28/09/2010 07:15:04 PM
- 568 Views
It's all blather - Any Forsaken can take out any other Forsaken. Even in a stand-up fight.
28/09/2010 02:08:13 PM
- 637 Views
I agree, most Forsaken will not 'arm wrestle' each other, they will kill. *NM*
28/09/2010 06:36:38 PM
- 188 Views
Agreed... Now when will the earthquake come? *NM*
28/09/2010 07:02:02 PM
- 197 Views
What earthquake? There is no proof of any earthquake! You're just prejudiced in favor of Egwene! *NM*
28/09/2010 07:25:19 PM
- 193 Views
There HAS to be an earthquake. You, me, RPA and Sidious agreed in one single thread! *NM*
28/09/2010 08:24:22 PM
- 202 Views
Yes, I GET it. My reply was an ironic commentary on our usual style correspondance. *NM*
28/09/2010 08:55:19 PM
- 234 Views