Active Users:762 Time:23/12/2024 08:34:45 AM
I haven't read the review but... DomA Send a noteboard - 25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM
Jason's very confused review, which meanders back and forth, and definitely has some sentences incomplete, is linked below.


5) A last throwaway line says that the story begins with Rand walking down the mountain to have a long overdue chat with somebody. Obviously, this is Egwene, and I'm deeply peeved this is the first chapter. Like DomA said in an other thread, this messes up timelines heavily. And also takes away from the final moments of tGS. Egwene saying that someday they will find out the significance of the break in the clouds sounded like Foreshadowing for a later meeting with Rand. Apparently, she's going to meet him in a few hours. Not cool at all.


I disagree it takes away from the final moments of TGS. My prediction remains the same as it was last year: when he climbs down the mountain, Rand's priority will be to mend bridges with his friends, lovers and allies. Rand understands the reason why the Pattern must be fought for and saved is for the joys of living, the happiness of friendships, and love that make life, and its tears and pain, worth living.

It wouldn't make much sense for that new man, now a champion of life, to have this epiphany, come down and say "now, I must decide when to send my troops and how to seal the Bore". Nope... this man will want first to make amend for letting the Dragon Reborn take over Rand al'Thor so completely, for letting himself become so hard as to cast away friends and allies, for using them so harshly and so on. He is no doubt aware this is his last chance to fill himself with his humanity, recharge his batteries, gain strength from friends, from love, before they all have to fight TG. One thing which might frigthen Rand is having to mend his relationship to Tam, and to talk again to Nynaeve and Cadsuane, because he's really been at his worst there and might be too ashamed to deal with this immediately. For this he might wait. That leaves the option of Aviendha, but she's probably in Rhuidean, and Elayne in Andor, but he might not want to appear there and create problems for her (I think Rand might decide to wait for a reunion of his three women with him). Min is with Cadsuane, so... Mat and Perrin can wait, as they're not really estranged from Rand, and neither has suffered Rand at his worst.

The other important one to try to mend bridges with is of course Egwene that in his darkness he's come to consider unfairly as an enemy. New Rand might see beside staying out of his hair and not kneel to him, Egwene has done nothing belligerent towards him (unlike Elaida). And she's right there in Tar Valon, and face to face they might come to an understanding at last (but then... this is Egwene, and this is Rand, and every time they spoke, it spiraled into a bitter argument in no time... they just rub each other wrong, these two). Rand is "diguised" in the garb he got from Tinkers, anonymous. He can wander a bit around and in TV and learn the Tower has been reunited and Egwene is Amyrlin, and decides to have with her the one-on-one chat he wishes (and she wishes too).

This could very well happen, but I remain undecided. Rand is supposed to face Egwene and the women with her, and among them there is a Seanchan. So this doesn't fit with an early meeeting. At least, this is not the "big meeting". If it is Egwene and not for instance Cadsuane Rand intends to have a chat with, then this is likely just the set up meeting to a later more public confrontation between the two. Perhaps Rand could make amend by telling Egwene Logain thinks Taim is a DF, and Egwene tellling Rand she sent Logain to him. Perhaps the seeds of an alliance betwen Rand through Logain and Egwene are planted this way. Rand would learn the Tower has been attacked by the Seanchan, and could ask Egwene to ally with Logain to deal with them. It sounds early for any of this, though.


As for the timeline, was there definitive proof that the book starts this way? You say this was toward the end of the review (I couldn't read it before it vanished) and that the review was meandering and more like ideas thrown on paper than a proper text (as I understand). Could it be that Jason meant Rand's story in TOM begins with this, not the book itself? It would make a lot of sense, because while Brandon now says the book has quite a bit of furthering of Rand's and Egwene's storylines, he is still also on record for saying last year that until the reunion of the main characters, they'd have "bridge chapters" that would bring things from the ending of TGS to the reunion.... He spoke then of about the same number of chapters Perrin and Mat got in TGS, which would mean about 10% of TOM would be devoted to those bridge chapters for Rand and Egwene - which is a fair amount of them, especially when you take into account their stories will also be furthered at and beyond the reunion itself too.

Let's hope so, because if Brandon really starts the book at the ending of TGS, and goes back and forth constantly on the timelines, I think I'll be really pissed. It doesn't seem to make much sense, though, that Brandon would reveal at the beginning of TOM what Rand intends to do, and how things will go with Egwene, when Perrin's and Mat's storylines will converge with them at the end of the book. That sounds like a very silly way to structure the book, and that's beginning to mess up RJ's intents way too much.

The prologue really made me wince quite a few times, just seeing the mess Brandon has created by dividing the books by storylines instead of chronologically. I guess it won't matter to many (most?), but personally I'm quite displeased we lost the "leitmotiv" of the "Storm" RJ had created through the original prologue and lost his neat structuring of an "intro scene" (the farmer, the storm is coming, and finally deciding to go north to join the army gathering there), the middle act with Lan, and finally the "third act" with the storm finally attacking and the invasion starting. Another really neat thing we lost is the association of smithing to armies, and the need for blacksmiths, that then lead into Perrin's dream where he builds an army of iron figurines (or turns his army of men into iron)... Then we lost the effect of (perhaps) Fain's greatest scene, wandering madly toward Shayol Ghul and the final confrontation, hatred his only emotion, falling more and more into insanity, completely obsessed, not stopping for anything on his path. That scene had no place in TOM. RJ clearly intended it as a prologue mirror for Rand's darkness and insanity. Rand, darkly progressing toward SG, falling into insanity and hatred, falling in the trap Aridhol had fallen into after Mordeth, was to remind us at every turn in TGS of that scene with Fain in the prologue. It comes way too late to have this intended effect now, and it will never get its proper place either. That's sad. By insisting to streamline TGS to a narrow focus, it sounds very much that Brandon has dumbed it down, deprived AMOL of its more layered, complex and subtle development of themes...


Oh, we will still get the story, but it's more and more obvious how much of RJ's subtleties we've lost and we'll lose. Pity. We will never get the "revelations" as RJ intended either, and the more Brandon messes up with the timelines, the more this will turn into shabby plot twists where RJ no doubt planned great dramatic build-ups. I think we've already learned of some prophecies too soon (three as one, for instance), and I fear more and more Brandon has cheated by keeping for TOM some too revealing scenes that will now be "flashbacks". It sounds more and more likely RJ was completely right to say he could see no great way to divide this book. Pity they've chickened out and decided to change RJ's plans to get a book out last year, instead of respecting his structure, writing the three volumes and waiting to publish them at once.
This message last edited by DomA on 25/09/2010 at 07:37:30 PM
Reply to message
Jason's review... Looks like DomA was right (Review is now removed) - 25/09/2010 05:40:18 AM 3441 Views
Re: Jason's review (spoilerish thoughts from me, so BEWARE!). Looks like DomA was right - 25/09/2010 06:00:46 AM 1263 Views
Pretty sure it's not Egwene... - 25/09/2010 07:07:00 AM 1199 Views
Oh well - I was wrong - 27/09/2010 03:56:59 PM 904 Views
Ituralde - 25/09/2010 06:29:26 AM 1027 Views
Read the ToM rules - 25/09/2010 07:44:22 AM 947 Views
I officially hate reviews of WoT (in general) - 25/09/2010 08:10:43 AM 1022 Views
I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 09:45:10 AM 1090 Views
Re: I take Jason's reviews with a pinch of salt - 25/09/2010 03:50:40 PM 934 Views
Perrin will probably gather the wolves... - 25/09/2010 09:57:06 AM 1081 Views
I suppose Olver could be the one who takes off Mat's eye *NM* - 25/09/2010 10:01:17 AM 500 Views
The review is now gone. *NM* - 25/09/2010 04:10:59 PM 510 Views
Unfortunately, there's not much left for Elayne to do. - 25/09/2010 07:14:09 PM 1127 Views
I haven't read the review but... - 25/09/2010 07:22:48 PM 1518 Views
That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 08:25:42 PM 1112 Views
It's odd, I didn't see any reference to Rand descending from DM in his review. - 25/09/2010 08:39:33 PM 950 Views
It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 08:55:49 PM 1047 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:03:14 PM 939 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 09:54:28 PM 918 Views
Re: It was the very last line... - 25/09/2010 10:09:58 PM 1183 Views
Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 25/09/2010 10:46:23 PM 1018 Views
Re: Mike quit being obsessed about 6 years ago (maybe longer?) - 26/09/2010 01:11:52 AM 1018 Views
I blame JordanCon too. - 26/09/2010 02:17:50 AM 1077 Views
Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 26/09/2010 10:04:40 PM 993 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 07:20:11 AM 975 Views
Re: Regarding the WOTFAQ, Tam, - 27/09/2010 11:03:35 AM 985 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 01:07:59 AM 1058 Views
Re: I blame JordanCon too. - 27/09/2010 07:35:04 AM 1019 Views
Re: That's not what I meant... - 25/09/2010 09:49:17 PM 1220 Views
Some thoughts on a potential meeting... - 26/09/2010 05:11:06 AM 1133 Views
Regarding Brandon's messing up of the timelines... - 25/09/2010 11:34:06 PM 1081 Views
To me it's two different things - 26/09/2010 01:48:13 AM 1169 Views
I agree - 26/09/2010 03:09:04 AM 968 Views
My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 03:50:36 AM 1045 Views
Re: My thought was not that they "dumbed it down" - 26/09/2010 11:42:12 PM 1236 Views
KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 10:27:04 AM 976 Views
Re: KOD and TOM show where TGS could have been 'fixed' - 26/09/2010 09:35:41 PM 1107 Views
Whose really to blame though? - 27/09/2010 03:43:30 AM 957 Views
A suggestion? - 26/09/2010 11:39:08 AM 1105 Views
Is there a copy of the review somewhere? *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:40:22 AM 588 Views
The review is back up... - 27/09/2010 01:59:50 AM 950 Views
It wasn't quite identical... It was missing the line about Rand walking down from DM - 27/09/2010 06:42:47 AM 954 Views
The line about Rand wasn't there when I read the review Saturday morning either. *NM* - 27/09/2010 01:57:00 PM 437 Views
It was... - 27/09/2010 04:22:24 PM 807 Views
I must have missed it then. It does fit with Tor's not releasing Chapter 1 early. *NM* - 27/09/2010 05:06:36 PM 445 Views
What do you mean? - 27/09/2010 11:33:15 PM 862 Views
It was at the very bottom of the post and hard to find - 28/09/2010 12:44:56 AM 755 Views
Olver - 27/09/2010 11:34:40 AM 1106 Views
He's Demandred, natch. - 27/09/2010 03:54:09 PM 849 Views
Re: Olver - 27/09/2010 05:42:25 PM 902 Views
Re: Olver darkfriend? - 28/09/2010 12:02:11 AM 962 Views
'Tis a shame. I love spoilers. - 27/09/2010 03:16:02 PM 971 Views
One problem with the idea of a Rand-Egwene meeting in Chapter 1 beyond timeline issues - 27/09/2010 10:29:15 PM 889 Views
Not true... - 28/09/2010 01:00:40 AM 875 Views
Good call. I assumed, and still do, that the two events are one in the same. - 28/09/2010 01:10:13 AM 952 Views
I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 01:47:40 AM 803 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 02:00:59 AM 859 Views
Re: I don't think so... - 28/09/2010 03:07:08 AM 1696 Views
Not true indeed... and.... - 28/09/2010 02:24:00 AM 1110 Views
Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 28/09/2010 03:31:24 AM 838 Views
Re: Mesaana and the Foretelling... - 13/10/2010 01:32:12 AM 1174 Views

Reply to Message