Active Users:1203 Time:23/02/2025 08:44:36 PM
I completely agree... DomA Send a noteboard - 23/09/2010 08:54:17 PM
These were some the most distracting things reading TGS and it doesn't seem to have improved.

It's been said by the various parties that Harriet already edited out a lot words and expressions she found too "modern" for WOT (and there was this story going, from Brandon himself IRRC, about the big argument over keeping the spelling constant and using the form of some words RJ was using. Brandon ended up finding an example where RJ had used the spelling he wanted to prove to Harriet), and while I understand she could not well rewrite the whole thing, I think she let slide way too much that could easily be fixed. The switches to contemporary terminology was one of those. There was the military ones, there was stuff in Aviendha's POVs too, IRRC.

I generally agree that attempting to mimic Jordan's style would have hindered Brandon's storytelling too much, feel very unnatural and could easily have turned into parody, but Harriet's too light hand was still somewhat of a disapointement. It seems she edited his WOT stuff too much as she would have one of his own books.

It wasn't book-breaking on the whole, but it spoiled my fun a lot of times (and alas, my hopes that it would be a "first read shock" and I would forget about that on re reads proved wrong)

Most egregiously is his use of the word "one" as a personal pronoun.


(...)

I shudder to thing how he's going to handle Elayne's dialogue or thought process, since RJ walked a fine line with her making her come across as both educated and sophisticated and at the same time unaffected.


Elayne worries me quite a bit too. I found none of the more sophisticated characters convincing in TGS. The dialogue of the secondary AS was all pretty badly handled, from Romanda to Lelaine, to those with Mat, and most noticeably Cadsuane. Then there was Graendal, and Tuon too had lost a lot of her luster.

I'm pretty sure we'll loose a lot of subtlety with Elayne.

I'm also afraid about Birgitte. She's another tricky character to write for. There's something reminescent of Mat in the way RJ wrote her, and in TGS Brandon showed one of the things that was hardest for him was to get into RJ's humor.

At least I hope for these two Brandon will sin by going a bit too bland rather than going over the top. Elayne has a very subtle, very understated and unassumed way of being funny. As for Birgitte, it's like Mat - a very fine line between right and too much and annoying.

That too, the "voices" and thoght processes, was disappointing in TGS. I had expected Harriet to polish things up more than she did. I guess she's been spoiled by RJ, who by all accounts had an extraordinary memory. It sounds like Harriet edited the dialogue in TGS more from her memory/instinct than, considering the writer was dead, go the long way and analyze prior scenes and nitpick over details. Alas, details often make the difference. On the whole, characterization was quite OK (on the whole not so surprising, given RJ had set up all the character development himself and Brandon "only" had to carry the players through plot points and fill holes), but that was undermined often by the dialogue/language/thought processes that were too unpolished.

That aside, the other major point of annoyance with Brandon for me is to have thrown overboard too many of the unsaid "rules". Jordan's storytelling was old fashioned, and his story was complex and vast enough as it is. The furthest RJ went was to have storylines that did not affect or cross one another follow different timelines. You couldn't always tell (for eg in COT) what Elayne was up to during Perrin's scenes (there was no reason for it either...), but the internal coherence of each storyline was always paramount and always respected. I'm massively pissed off Brandon decided to change that rule, like he did with the flashback scene in Distinctions. Already we have to cope with the fact Mat and Perrin's story won't progress in parallel with Rand/Egwene and both were already behind in KOD - the last thing we need is "cut scenes" from Rand's or Egwene's storyline pushed to TOM, and not only that but placed wherever Brandon wished instead of adhering to RJ's style of handling the various timelines.


This message last edited by DomA on 23/09/2010 at 08:57:06 PM
Reply to message
mistakes sanderson makes that bug you - 23/09/2010 05:38:52 PM 1809 Views
Please read the posting rules for ToM *NM* - 23/09/2010 05:41:12 PM 3784 Views
Bael mentioning the Aiel Waste; characters using words that are too sophisticated or techical - 23/09/2010 06:11:34 PM 1039 Views
I completely agree... - 23/09/2010 08:54:17 PM 893 Views
Re: I completely agree... - 24/09/2010 01:57:38 AM 816 Views
Re: I completely agree... - 24/09/2010 06:39:17 PM 777 Views
The entire Graendal scene - 23/09/2010 06:27:03 PM 933 Views
I think this is the type of info that RJ never got around to revealing. - 23/09/2010 08:46:51 PM 787 Views
Pretty much... - 23/09/2010 09:16:26 PM 894 Views
The writing in the Graendal scene surprised me - 24/09/2010 12:20:50 AM 801 Views
Re: The writing in the Graendal scene surprised me - 24/09/2010 06:03:17 PM 800 Views
Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too? - 24/09/2010 04:09:48 AM 791 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too? - 24/09/2010 05:36:23 PM 878 Views
A lot of those are reasons why I always thought she was alive.. - 24/09/2010 06:10:35 PM 899 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too? - 25/09/2010 10:02:02 AM 684 Views
hmm - 25/09/2010 02:43:09 PM 690 Views
How she knows its Balefire.. - 25/09/2010 02:54:58 PM 667 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too? - 25/09/2010 08:30:59 PM 748 Views
Re: Actually, didn't RJ do the Forsaken infodump thing too? - 25/09/2010 08:48:05 PM 767 Views
Some things... - 25/09/2010 09:02:26 PM 669 Views
Speaking of Kerb - 25/09/2010 09:39:46 PM 663 Views
Mat - 24/09/2010 04:44:34 AM 712 Views
Not really a mistake, I guess - 25/09/2010 09:45:54 PM 696 Views
Well... - 26/09/2010 06:30:54 AM 792 Views
Thanks. I think I didn't notice it with RJ because - 26/09/2010 06:35:47 AM 684 Views
Re: Thanks. I think I didn't notice it with RJ because - 26/09/2010 06:51:07 AM 675 Views
You're welcome *NM* - 26/09/2010 07:17:36 AM 314 Views
Well... - 26/09/2010 07:37:39 AM 761 Views

Reply to Message