Active Users:1221 Time:23/11/2024 04:40:47 AM
Thanks. Phelix Send a noteboard - 02/09/2010 10:30:53 PM
Sadly, I don't have the answer.


Oh poo.

It is peculiar though, since their doesn't seem to be any environmental or sociological reason for humanity not to have grown in numbers and expanded back into the empty lands. All indications in the series are that conditions were very favourable for societal growth in the centuries preceding Rand's birth.


I agree. In fact, it almost seems as if the last 1,000 years has been entirely a period of decay. In addition to all the other recessions I mentioned before, we also saw the Blight expanding further South during this period, most notably by consuming Malkier.

There are fertile, wealthy nations that have abundant resources (Andor and Cairhien) who have all but relinquished their claims on still fertile and productive lands. I can understand the Borderlands not enlarging to the South because their focus has to be to the Blight, but all of that empty land between Cairhien and Shienar should be claimed and adequately filled. The Aiel War isn't enough reason for that land to be empty. Tarabon and Arad Doman shouldn't mutually agree to leave a whole country's worth of land empty, especially when it has a significant urban population in Falme. There's no reason for Far Madding not to claim the Plains of Maredo as previous nations based in Far Madding had done.

A counter example is in the south. Ghealdan, Lugard, Illian, and Amadicia are all tightly packed together, and apparently regularly have wars over their respective borders. Yet, there's the entire Shadow Coast to the south of Amadicia that is unclaimed.

I wonder if RJ had an explanation for this or if it's just something he didn't think through.


I hope there's an explanation. It just seems so glaring....
I was Phelix on wotmania, I will always be Phelix in the "real" world, and now I am Phelix on RAFO.

You will make all kinds of mistakes; but as long as you are generous and true and also fierce you cannot hurt the world or even seriously distress her.- Churchill

*MySmiley*
A map, for reference.
Reply to message
Why is humanity receding? - 02/09/2010 07:10:11 PM 1378 Views
This is an excellent question. - 02/09/2010 10:05:17 PM 956 Views
Thanks. - 02/09/2010 10:30:53 PM 877 Views
I think there is mass ennuis and exhaustion - 02/09/2010 10:30:32 PM 743 Views
Maybe... - 03/09/2010 12:20:08 AM 692 Views
Re: Maybe... - 03/09/2010 03:00:25 PM 643 Views
Re: Why is humanity receding? - 03/09/2010 12:10:30 AM 771 Views
I'm not sure. - 03/09/2010 12:23:00 AM 612 Views
Sometimes populations just declined - 03/09/2010 12:30:33 AM 753 Views
I hadn't thought of that. - 03/09/2010 12:52:01 AM 681 Views
Life conditions have been deteriorating gradually - 03/09/2010 02:06:03 AM 886 Views
As a peasant, I am offended, but as fan of WoT, I like your analysis =P - 03/09/2010 05:34:55 PM 618 Views
Well - 03/09/2010 09:45:40 PM 671 Views
very nice analysis! I think you summed it up almost perfectly - 05/09/2010 04:56:11 PM 637 Views
Cities of old - 23/09/2010 10:43:35 AM 561 Views
The Taint - 03/09/2010 05:41:21 AM 574 Views
Re: Why is humanity receding? - 03/09/2010 08:56:42 AM 727 Views
True. *NM* - 03/09/2010 06:57:25 PM 295 Views

Reply to Message