Active Users:946 Time:15/11/2024 06:35:33 AM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1167 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 650 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 669 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 586 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 588 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 646 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 642 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 596 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 566 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 617 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 716 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 597 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 555 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 527 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 635 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 529 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 505 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 587 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 721 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 649 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 587 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 575 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 588 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 539 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 529 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1029 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 612 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 566 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 516 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 567 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 529 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 618 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 603 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 567 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 546 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 556 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 522 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 596 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 644 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 629 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 563 Views

Reply to Message