Active Users:334 Time:20/12/2024 07:44:53 AM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1180 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 660 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 683 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 602 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 604 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 655 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 651 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 603 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 575 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 634 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 725 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 608 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 569 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 541 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 648 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 537 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 512 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 597 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 733 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 663 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 598 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 587 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 601 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 550 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 547 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1045 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 623 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 574 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 530 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 576 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 539 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 630 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 620 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 577 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 552 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 569 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 533 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 610 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 653 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 637 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 573 Views

Reply to Message