Active Users:749 Time:03/04/2025 05:23:51 AM
Well the point of the original poster NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.

Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.

NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O +<img class=' />
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1258 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 732 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 765 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 679 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 675 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 734 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 723 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 680 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 656 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 708 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 808 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 684 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 652 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 615 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 696 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 617 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 581 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 671 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 807 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 743 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 669 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 663 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 677 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 631 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 613 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1120 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 697 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 647 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 601 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 648 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 612 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 717 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 688 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 656 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 633 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 640 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 603 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 678 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 734 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 718 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 646 Views

Reply to Message