Technically, the narrator isn't omniscient in each individual scene - while throughout the book, we can see into everyone's thoughts, each scene is written in third-person limited. I see why you'd have a problem with the writing, though and I agree that it'd be a case of bad writing, but only in the sense that it confuses the reader. I can't believe that this wouldn't be from Rand's POV; I can't imagine any competent writer would use that kind of commentary unless it's specifically in the style of the novel to do so, and BS is definitely more competent than that.
Unfortunately that was the original point. Basically scalius is trying to say that the sword is Turak's ... ok, it fits a lot of the criteria, but why the "And not, oddly, from Lews Therin’s memories—but Rand’s own." There is no way LTT would recognise Turak's sword. Scalius's point was that maybe the "oddly" was from the narrator. ie. the narrator himself thought it odd, not Rand. Therefor NOT from Rand's POV but the narrator's. That's what I'm objecting to.
NaCl(3rd person ltd should stay that way)H2O ' />
Plot relevance of the sword
06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
- 1209 Views
Great
06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
- 710 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
- 629 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
- 629 Views
Re: Great
08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
- 748 Views
I see that differently
09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
- 601 Views
Re: I see that differently
09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
- 568 Views
Nice
07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
- 618 Views
Re: Nice
07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
- 625 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
- 582 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
- 568 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
- 599 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
- 1073 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
- 647 Views
see above for part
09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
- 603 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
- 556 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
- 598 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
- 567 Views
But is it...?
09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM
- 660 Views
Well the point of the original poster
10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM
- 635 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
- 606 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
- 633 Views