It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O ' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O ' />
And the more I think on it, the more I'm inclined to believe that the sword is part of the prologue (and it may be only in passing, noting that the DR was given a gift by locals or some such, or a quite detailed ceremony). I think we'll have a better idea next thursday.
However, I have to say (and not trying to trump myself here) that of all the ideas presented, my seems the simplest and most logical, based on pertinent events in the series. The others simply rely too much on convoluted ideas/events having to magically come together outside of what's actually going on in the books. I try to follow the KISS theory for the most part. And of course, my theory may be blown apart in the near future with a little more info from the book
As for being as big as Asmo.....nah. It may well turn out that this entire subject is a mere footnote in WOT history. The bottom line is it's a couple of paragraphs from the 1st chapter of an enormous book. However it's all we've got to work with right now, and we've been dying for things to work with....so off we go!
btw, nice to be in discussions with you again Salty! We are so close to having loads of new material to debate. The old wotmania board had become so stale due to lack of new content. That should all change around here soon....
I would slave, to pave the way, to sink your ship of fools.
This message last edited by scalius on 09/09/2009 at 07:42:29 PM
Plot relevance of the sword
06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
- 1167 Views
Great
06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
- 669 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
- 586 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
- 588 Views
Re: Great
08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
- 716 Views
I see that differently
09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
- 555 Views
Re: I see that differently
09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
- 526 Views
Nice
07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
- 575 Views
Re: Nice
07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
- 587 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
- 539 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
- 528 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
- 572 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
- 1028 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
- 612 Views
see above for part
09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
- 566 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
- 516 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
- 567 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
- 529 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
- 567 Views
Not sure
09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
- 545 Views
We'll find out I guess
09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM
- 556 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
- 596 Views