Why not require AS to take an oath never to channel with an a'dam on... this would negate the ability of Seanchen to make AS prisoner, and actually makes the job harder for the Seanchen...
With the sul'dam forcing them they cannot help but to channel. The oath would make it impossible to form any weaves. I think the resulting conflict might lead to the death of the AS.
Two conflicting oaths would eventually lead to death, we've seen that they suffocate if they must lie and not lie at the same time. What would the reaction be between an Oath and the a'dam link?
About the oath "I won't give in to the Seanchan". The Oath doesn't give them any added quality to resist the Seanchan, does it? So if they're thinking of giving in they break the oath and..something.
I think you're right about the demane/AS dying. There was as scene where an AS was forced to take an oath to obey so and so and that person refused to believe what was coming out of her mouth and ordered her to say it was not so. The AS was on the floor literally dying before someone else pointed out that the poor woman believed what she had said was true and would be killed by the conflicting oaths, "Speak no word that is not true." and "Obey what's her name."
SO if they took an oath to never channel with an a'dam on and the Suldam forced her to channel I think either she would be killed or the sul'dam would kill her for disobedience.
The White Tower has all the tools to defeat the Senahcan...
03/08/2010 10:32:03 PM
- 1599 Views
Re: The White Tower has all the tools to defeat the Senahcan...
03/08/2010 10:53:38 PM
- 1036 Views
Why not take an oath...
04/08/2010 12:09:46 AM
- 919 Views
or just adapt the one power as a weapon oath to include a sister's freedom as well as her life
*NM*
04/08/2010 01:45:43 AM
- 381 Views

Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 09:10:42 AM
- 1059 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 01:43:02 PM
- 892 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 07:14:24 PM
- 785 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 07:44:10 PM
- 807 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 08:33:18 AM
- 760 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 01:15:47 PM
- 782 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 04:33:25 PM
- 842 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
06/08/2010 12:02:16 AM
- 823 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 02:57:31 PM
- 831 Views
they can't
04/08/2010 12:54:46 AM
- 917 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 02:27:45 AM
- 915 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 07:09:45 AM
- 881 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 02:44:10 PM
- 816 Views
read the oaths again
04/08/2010 08:15:24 PM
- 854 Views
I don't think #1 is as simple as you say.
04/08/2010 02:22:25 AM
- 817 Views
For the most part, they can only defend themselves...
04/08/2010 10:59:23 AM
- 999 Views
Re: For the most part, they can only defend themselves...
05/08/2010 01:17:44 AM
- 843 Views
I think the BT would wipe the floor with the damane on their home turf
05/08/2010 08:19:38 PM
- 766 Views
Re: I think the BT would wipe the floor with the damane on their home turf
05/08/2010 11:57:43 PM
- 801 Views
Whoa whoa whoa!
06/08/2010 03:07:34 AM
- 814 Views
I actually think the opposite: the damane would wipe the floor with the BT
13/08/2010 11:27:21 PM
- 819 Views
My thoughts on the damane...
05/08/2010 04:11:35 AM
- 770 Views
How exactly would Egwene learn where the Damane are kept?
05/08/2010 07:57:55 PM
- 1016 Views
Interrogate the Damane.
05/08/2010 10:32:17 PM
- 719 Views