Ah, but they only have to find a way around 1 component of any of the Oaths, not all of them or even an 'entire' Oath. The Oath in question specifically gives an exemption for using the Power as a weapon if another Sister's life is in danger. I think that argument can be made for the Sisters already taken by the Seanchan so is justification for 'offensive/first-strike' use of the One Power as a weapon.
Except that the Seanchan consider captured damane to be extremely valuable and as such the lives of captured sisters are infact NOT in danger at all. The Seanchan would keep them alive and healthy as well as they could, just as they would any usefull "tool" (which is what the damane are to the Seanchan).
The freedom/sanity of the captured sisters is in danger yes, but in its current form the oaths care only about their lives. Maybe if an AS could convince herself that being broken and brainwashed by the collar would be a death of sort, then they could claim that the "life" of the sister was in danger. But again this would be the type of mental gymnastic that I suspect few would be capable off.
Personally it would be smartest to just get rid of the oath alltogether, or atleast add an exception for the Seanchan. This exception would keep the people who are AS-positive/neutral happy, but allow unlimited warfare against the Seanchan.
The White Tower has all the tools to defeat the Senahcan...
03/08/2010 10:32:03 PM
- 1503 Views
Re: The White Tower has all the tools to defeat the Senahcan...
03/08/2010 10:53:38 PM
- 945 Views
Why not take an oath...
04/08/2010 12:09:46 AM
- 816 Views
or just adapt the one power as a weapon oath to include a sister's freedom as well as her life *NM*
04/08/2010 01:45:43 AM
- 335 Views
Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 09:10:42 AM
- 953 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 01:43:02 PM
- 790 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 07:14:24 PM
- 677 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
04/08/2010 07:44:10 PM
- 703 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 08:33:18 AM
- 655 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 01:15:47 PM
- 686 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
05/08/2010 04:33:25 PM
- 735 Views
Re: Perhaps they would die?
06/08/2010 12:02:16 AM
- 720 Views
they can't
04/08/2010 12:54:46 AM
- 816 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 02:27:45 AM
- 809 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 07:09:45 AM
- 782 Views
Re: they can't
04/08/2010 02:44:10 PM
- 722 Views
read the oaths again
04/08/2010 08:15:24 PM
- 750 Views
I don't think #1 is as simple as you say.
04/08/2010 02:22:25 AM
- 719 Views
For the most part, they can only defend themselves...
04/08/2010 10:59:23 AM
- 882 Views
Re: For the most part, they can only defend themselves...
05/08/2010 01:17:44 AM
- 746 Views
I think the BT would wipe the floor with the damane on their home turf
05/08/2010 08:19:38 PM
- 672 Views
Re: I think the BT would wipe the floor with the damane on their home turf
05/08/2010 11:57:43 PM
- 701 Views
Whoa whoa whoa!
06/08/2010 03:07:34 AM
- 710 Views
I actually think the opposite: the damane would wipe the floor with the BT
13/08/2010 11:27:21 PM
- 719 Views
My thoughts on the damane...
05/08/2010 04:11:35 AM
- 666 Views
How exactly would Egwene learn where the Damane are kept?
05/08/2010 07:57:55 PM
- 907 Views
Interrogate the Damane.
05/08/2010 10:32:17 PM
- 616 Views