Active Users:424 Time:29/04/2025 12:50:34 PM
Read what I added - it's even sweeter when you play out other repercussions newyorkersedai Send a noteboard - 03/08/2010 04:01:48 AM
I love the idea, I just don't think RJ(BS) would have spent time doing this with two books left. Same with newyorker's idea (which I also really like) that the Aes Sedai would help keep the captured ones from breaking.


Thanks and yes, you're right - we've got enough here for a 30 book series, although we'd have to hope for several arcs that jump around. It would keep us from another repeat of books 7-9/10.

fionwe deserves credit for a really nice catch...
Reply to message
Egwene will contact Elaida... - 02/08/2010 07:08:06 PM 1378 Views
Re: Egwene will contact Elaida... - 02/08/2010 08:13:47 PM 743 Views
Re: Egwene will contact Elaida... - 02/08/2010 10:02:32 PM 787 Views
Re: Egwene will contact Elaida... - 03/08/2010 03:41:52 AM 627 Views
On the subject of linking - 03/08/2010 05:22:10 AM 513 Views
Would you rather be shielded or incinerated? Some protection. *NM* - 03/08/2010 12:23:29 PM 208 Views
Incinerated *NM* - 03/08/2010 01:52:31 PM 190 Views
Its not a choice between the two... - 03/08/2010 10:12:10 PM 438 Views
decimate has multiple meanings and fionwe used it correctly. - 04/08/2010 08:45:33 PM 401 Views
I think you've hit on a great idea! - 03/08/2010 12:50:22 AM 640 Views
You have something there. - 03/08/2010 02:48:38 AM 498 Views
Stuff like this makes me wish the series would last forever - 03/08/2010 03:23:56 AM 465 Views
Read what I added - it's even sweeter when you play out other repercussions - 03/08/2010 04:01:48 AM 528 Views
Hasn't the series ALREADY lasted forever? *NM* - 03/08/2010 08:26:36 AM 179 Views
Wouldn't it be dangerous for Egwene to enter Elaida's dream? - 03/08/2010 08:09:19 AM 483 Views
She could always pull Elaida into TAR *NM* - 03/08/2010 04:22:03 PM 199 Views
This is true. - 03/08/2010 09:45:48 PM 407 Views
I doubt it - 03/08/2010 08:24:47 AM 517 Views
Re: I doubt it - 03/08/2010 12:51:28 PM 455 Views

Reply to Message