It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1a52b/1a52be5fa4a14ae0bd34e0abc51eb8764f3c3136" alt="+<img class="
Plot relevance of the sword
06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
- 1242 Views
Great
06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
- 752 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
- 663 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
- 661 Views
Re: Great
08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
- 779 Views
I see that differently
09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
- 638 Views
Re: I see that differently
09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
- 599 Views
Nice
07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
- 649 Views
Re: Nice
07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
- 659 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
- 614 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
- 598 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
- 613 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
- 1101 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
- 682 Views
see above for part
09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
- 633 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
- 584 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
- 632 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
- 598 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
- 638 Views
Not sure
09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
- 617 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
- 663 Views