It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O ' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O ' />
Plot relevance of the sword
06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
- 1181 Views
Great
06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
- 683 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
- 602 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
- 605 Views
Re: Great
08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
- 725 Views
I see that differently
09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
- 569 Views
Re: I see that differently
09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
- 541 Views
Nice
07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
- 587 Views
Re: Nice
07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
- 602 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
- 550 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
- 548 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
- 582 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
- 1046 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
- 623 Views
see above for part
09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
- 574 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
- 531 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
- 576 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
- 539 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
- 577 Views
Not sure
09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
- 553 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
- 610 Views