It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O ' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O ' />
Plot relevance of the sword
06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
- 1167 Views
Great
06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
- 669 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
- 586 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
- 588 Views
Re: Great
08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
- 716 Views
I see that differently
09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
- 555 Views
Re: I see that differently
09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
- 527 Views
Nice
07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
- 575 Views
Re: Nice
07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
- 588 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
- 539 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
- 529 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
- 572 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
- 1029 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
- 612 Views
see above for part
09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
- 566 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
- 516 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
- 567 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
- 529 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
- 567 Views
Not sure
09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
- 546 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
- 596 Views