It's my interpretation that the "centuries old" part refers to both sword and scabbard. AFAIC, the wording is ambiguous enough to mean either one, the other or both.
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O
' />
If the sword is mentioned in the prologue we've got merely another 8 days, otherwise let the theory writing begin!
NaCl(do you think it will be as big as Asmo?)H2O

Plot relevance of the sword
06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM
- 1262 Views
Great
06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM
- 774 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM
- 684 Views
Re: Great
07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM
- 681 Views
Re: Great
08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM
- 822 Views
I see that differently
09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM
- 662 Views
Re: I see that differently
09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
- 622 Views
Nice
07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM
- 670 Views
Re: Nice
07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM
- 684 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
- 636 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this
07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM
- 620 Views
I'd favor it being Justice, they probably tell us in the prologue
09/09/2009 05:46:37 PM
- 636 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak
08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM
- 1126 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers
09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM
- 706 Views
see above for part
09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM
- 654 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM
- 607 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it
09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM
- 654 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want.
09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
- 618 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons?
09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM
- 663 Views
Not sure
09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM
- 638 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak
09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM
- 685 Views