Active Users:2533 Time:23/01/2025 01:52:35 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1209 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 684 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 710 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 629 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 628 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 685 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 673 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 632 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 604 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 655 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 748 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 635 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 601 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 567 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 665 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 564 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 537 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 620 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 757 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 693 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 621 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 618 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 625 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 582 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 567 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1072 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 647 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 603 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 556 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 598 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 567 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 660 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 634 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 606 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 580 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 594 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 552 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 633 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 675 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 666 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 597 Views

Reply to Message