Active Users:1238 Time:23/02/2025 08:00:24 PM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1243 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 719 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 752 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 663 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 661 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 716 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 707 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 664 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 636 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 693 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 780 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 664 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 639 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 600 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 678 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 604 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 567 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 654 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 786 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 727 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 654 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 650 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 660 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 615 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 599 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1102 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 683 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 633 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 584 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 632 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 599 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 702 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 672 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 639 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 617 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 624 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 588 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 664 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 714 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 701 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 632 Views

Reply to Message