Active Users:452 Time:15/11/2024 05:48:22 AM
No, He's giving me way more than I want. NaClH2O Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM
I understand how omniscient voice works. What I DON'T want from that writing voice is editorializing. I have no need of and don't want to know how the narrator feels about anyone's thoughts. All I want is the pure thought. This is along the same lines as learning that the narrator thinks that a particular thought from say Elayne is slutty, or one from Nynaeve is timid or whatever. Bad bad writing. An omniscient narrator should do ONLY narration, no commenting, editorializing or any other 3rd party stuff. I really don't care and really really really don't want to know what the narrator thinks, only what the characters think. Interpretation should be left to the reader, and reader alone.

NaCl(climbs down from the soapbox )H2O +<img class=' />

edit: eliminated the stupid mo smiley
This message last edited by NaClH2O on 09/09/2009 at 05:29:11 PM
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1166 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 649 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 667 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 585 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 586 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 645 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 641 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 595 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 565 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 615 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 715 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 596 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 554 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 526 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 634 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 528 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 504 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 586 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 720 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 648 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 587 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 574 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 587 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 538 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 528 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1027 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 611 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 565 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 514 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 566 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 529 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 617 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 602 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 566 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 545 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 555 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 521 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 595 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 643 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 628 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 562 Views

Reply to Message