Active Users:344 Time:26/04/2025 01:16:23 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1262 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 739 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 774 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 683 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 680 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 742 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 727 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 684 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 660 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 716 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 822 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 690 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 661 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 622 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 700 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 622 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 587 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 674 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 810 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 748 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 673 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 670 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 684 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 635 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 619 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1126 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 706 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 654 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 606 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 653 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 617 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 723 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 692 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 662 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 637 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 643 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 608 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 684 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 737 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 722 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 652 Views

Reply to Message