Active Users:1246 Time:23/02/2025 07:49:57 PM
Re: I see that differently Kieran Send a noteboard - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM
Exactly, the narrator made the distinction that it was Rand who recognized the sword. That should solidly debunk the LTT's sword theory.

As far as the False Dragon's sword theory, that has no basis at all. It could be any of the false dragon's over the 'centuries'.

In regards to Justice theory, the only problem seems to be that some don't believe Artur would have a dragon on his scabbard because he was his enemy always. But...

"I have fought by your side times beyond number, Lews Therin, and faced you as many more..."


So he was his ally as often as his enemy...

"Something is wrong here, something holds me." Suddenly ht turned his sharp-eyed gaze on Rand. "You are here. Have you the banner?"


Hmm, how odd, he seems to need a certain banner, with a certain symbol on it to fight under. I wonder which symbol it could be?

"Yes." Rand tore open the straps of his saddlebags and pulled out the Dragon's banner.


Oh yeah, the dragon...

So apparently he Artur wasn't always the Dragon's enemy, and he would fight under the Dragon.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1243 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 719 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 752 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 663 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 661 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 716 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 707 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 664 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 636 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 693 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 780 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 663 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 639 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 600 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 678 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 603 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 566 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 654 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 786 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 727 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 654 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 650 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 660 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 615 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 599 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1102 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 683 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 633 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 584 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 632 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 598 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 702 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 672 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 639 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 617 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 624 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 588 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 664 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 714 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 701 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 632 Views

Reply to Message