Active Users:801 Time:03/04/2025 06:47:34 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM
Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.


It makes sense to me. Moridin is Rand's counterpart - whereas the Creator gives Rand free choice to fight the battle, the DO is an "uber-control freak" (author's words) and it seems weird to me that he would have two different agents (SH and Moridin) when power is always more potent when coming from one person.

Even if SH IS a different entity, I would be surprised if Moridin wasn't in some way infested with the DO's presence. It would be completely out of character for the DO to not have a form of direct control over him.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1640 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1029 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 932 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 894 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 736 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 956 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 838 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1037 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 888 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1188 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 937 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1043 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 866 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 927 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 937 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 883 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 986 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 842 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1082 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1108 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 802 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 905 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 900 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 847 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 910 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 769 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 728 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 835 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 848 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 950 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 789 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 942 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 875 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 925 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 829 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 442 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 998 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 844 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 914 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 878 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 778 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 730 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 947 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 821 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 713 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 727 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 759 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 779 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 822 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 867 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 672 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 916 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 797 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 728 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 965 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 803 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 698 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 983 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes