Active Users:1072 Time:23/12/2024 06:37:22 PM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM
Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.


It makes sense to me. Moridin is Rand's counterpart - whereas the Creator gives Rand free choice to fight the battle, the DO is an "uber-control freak" (author's words) and it seems weird to me that he would have two different agents (SH and Moridin) when power is always more potent when coming from one person.

Even if SH IS a different entity, I would be surprised if Moridin wasn't in some way infested with the DO's presence. It would be completely out of character for the DO to not have a form of direct control over him.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1562 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 952 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 863 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 824 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 663 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 875 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 765 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 968 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 814 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1112 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 869 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 964 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 822 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 849 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 867 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 808 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 908 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 768 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1000 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1031 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 727 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 830 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 831 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 776 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 846 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 698 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 658 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 764 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 777 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 888 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 718 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 868 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 801 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 854 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 743 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 410 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 933 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 771 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 848 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 812 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 707 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 659 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 877 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 746 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 645 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 688 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 682 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 709 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 755 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 793 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 607 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 850 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 727 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 653 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 886 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 730 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 621 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 918 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes