Active Users:2885 Time:23/01/2025 03:20:47 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM
Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.


It makes sense to me. Moridin is Rand's counterpart - whereas the Creator gives Rand free choice to fight the battle, the DO is an "uber-control freak" (author's words) and it seems weird to me that he would have two different agents (SH and Moridin) when power is always more potent when coming from one person.

Even if SH IS a different entity, I would be surprised if Moridin wasn't in some way infested with the DO's presence. It would be completely out of character for the DO to not have a form of direct control over him.
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1588 Views
No... Etzel - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 980 Views
Re: No... saidarisnowtainted - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 888 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! Narg - 23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM 843 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory! saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM 684 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) Mik - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 902 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same Deadsy - 23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM 791 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 985 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below Mik - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 837 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. Mik - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1137 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable Etzel - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 891 Views
Au contraire. Mik - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 989 Views
But why... Etzel - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 834 Views
Re: But why... Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 869 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. Mik - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 892 Views
I think it would have to work this way: Lord Haart - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 831 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. Mik - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 932 Views
Um not quite Ryan - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 794 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1028 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. Ishamael - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1061 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... Etzel - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 750 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Mik - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 849 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Etzel - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 849 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 799 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Etzel - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 865 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 724 Views
The problem is... Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 681 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. Mik - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 787 Views
I already answered all this... Etzel - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 798 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 906 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 737 Views
Agreed then. Mik - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 892 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: Mik - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 822 Views
No problem Etzel - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 868 Views
Why does that scene matter? Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 775 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 419 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. Mik - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 952 Views
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 790 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? Mik - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 867 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 834 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Lord Haart - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 725 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... Etzel - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 682 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. Mik - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 900 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Gher - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 769 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Lord Haart - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 673 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... Gher - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 700 Views
One should also remember... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 707 Views
Eh? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 736 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 777 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? Mik - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 815 Views
I think... Etzel - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 627 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: Mik - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 868 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable saidarisnowtainted - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 751 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? Lohikaarme - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 676 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* Mik - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 914 Views
Not the same individual DomA - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 756 Views
Re: Not the same individual Lord Haart - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 645 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. Mik - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 938 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes