Active Users:358 Time:26/04/2025 01:30:11 PM
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
IMO it's completely wrong. I believe it should be absolutely obvious to anyone that Moridin and SH are separate characters, after reading the books and what the authors said on this matter. For some reason, a few people always tend to come up with those ideas that Moridin must be Taim, or that Mordin is SH in disguise, or now that Moridin & SH form a Slayer-like creature.

In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.

Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.

I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense. Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1646 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1036 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 936 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 964 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1044 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 893 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1196 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 942 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1047 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 871 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 931 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 943 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 888 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 991 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 848 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1089 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1117 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 807 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 910 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 908 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 853 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 916 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 774 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 735 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 839 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 853 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 956 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 794 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 949 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 884 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 934 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 834 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 447 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1004 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 850 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 920 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 885 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 784 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 736 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 953 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 834 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 720 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 733 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 765 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 784 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 828 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 873 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 679 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 921 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 804 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 737 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 971 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 808 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 703 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 988 Views

Reply to Message