Active Users:529 Time:06/04/2025 06:29:48 AM
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right Etzel Send a noteboard - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
IMO it's completely wrong. I believe it should be absolutely obvious to anyone that Moridin and SH are separate characters, after reading the books and what the authors said on this matter. For some reason, a few people always tend to come up with those ideas that Moridin must be Taim, or that Mordin is SH in disguise, or now that Moridin & SH form a Slayer-like creature.

In my view those thoughts aren't really supported by any convincing evidence; it's rather just the ambition to come up with a "most original theory" just for the sake of such an idea.

Plot-wise I don't see any sensible reason why RJ would rather literally want a physical link between Moridin and SH (and later also Rand), instead of simply having Mordin & SH work together very closely, because they follow the same philosophy.

I believe you are simply reading too much into a few words, while you ignore the blatant rest or believe it was only stated to fool the ordinary reader, though this hardly makes sense. Thus you make the whole matter more complicated and convoluted than it actually is, likely just because you became that sold on your pretty far-fetched idea. But we will see...
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1642 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 1032 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 934 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 961 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 1040 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 890 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1192 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 938 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 1045 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 867 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 929 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 939 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 884 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 988 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 845 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1084 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1112 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 803 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 906 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 903 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 850 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 914 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 771 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 731 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 837 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 849 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 953 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 792 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 945 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 878 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 928 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 831 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 443 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 1000 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 847 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 916 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 879 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 780 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 732 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 949 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 825 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 715 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 730 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 762 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 781 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 825 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 870 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 673 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 918 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 797 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 731 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 967 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 805 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 700 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 985 Views

Reply to Message