You suggest that Moridin and SH are one creature, fused together like Luc and Isam are, but actually also Ishy and SH 0.5. were already one creature. Your evidence is that the Trollocs named Ishy Ba'alzamon, and consequently he must have a physical link to a Myrddraal. The other evidence is that the Nae'blis is just half a step below the DO, and consequently the DO would fuse himself together with his Nae'blis. Finally, Carrdin was visited by SH 0.5. but after Ishy's death, Carridin was left alone for some reason, which is obviously that Ishy and SH 0.5. were one creature.
Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Moridin & Shadar Haran
22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM
- 1545 Views
No...
22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM
- 934 Views
Re: No...
22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM
- 847 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM
- 810 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM
- 646 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!)
23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM
- 861 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same
23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM
- 752 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same.
23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM
- 1098 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable
23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM
- 852 Views
Au contraire.
23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM
- 948 Views
But why...
23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM
- 808 Views
Again. RJ fooled you.
23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM
- 851 Views
I think it would have to work this way:
23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM
- 794 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think.
23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM
- 892 Views
Um not quite
25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM
- 754 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak...
26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM
- 711 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM
- 818 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
- 811 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM
- 764 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
- 833 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM
- 683 Views
The problem is...
26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM
- 639 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years.
27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM
- 751 Views
I already answered all this...
27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM
- 766 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong.
27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM
- 871 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are:
26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM
- 793 Views
No problem
26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM
- 840 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again..
26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM
- 919 Views
Just to understand you correctly...
26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
- 759 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"?
27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM
- 835 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
- 800 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM
- 727 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM
- 635 Views
One should also remember...
26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM
- 668 Views
Eh?
26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
- 691 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM*
26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM
- 743 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart?
26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
- 776 Views