You suggest that Moridin and SH are one creature, fused together like Luc and Isam are, but actually also Ishy and SH 0.5. were already one creature. Your evidence is that the Trollocs named Ishy Ba'alzamon, and consequently he must have a physical link to a Myrddraal. The other evidence is that the Nae'blis is just half a step below the DO, and consequently the DO would fuse himself together with his Nae'blis. Finally, Carrdin was visited by SH 0.5. but after Ishy's death, Carridin was left alone for some reason, which is obviously that Ishy and SH 0.5. were one creature.
Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Moridin & Shadar Haran
22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM
- 1743 Views
No...
22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM
- 1136 Views
Re: No...
22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM
- 1034 Views
Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
23/07/2010 03:41:00 AM
- 983 Views
Re: Don't let her talk you out of it so easily. Give us the reasons behind your theory!
27/07/2010 04:00:26 PM
- 826 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!)
23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM
- 1053 Views
I haven't seen those answers either so I'm interested. I don't think they're the same
23/07/2010 08:49:11 AM
- 930 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same.
23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM
- 1301 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable
23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM
- 1035 Views
Au contraire.
23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM
- 1135 Views
But why...
23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM
- 960 Views
Again. RJ fooled you.
23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM
- 1030 Views
I think it would have to work this way:
23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM
- 975 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think.
23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM
- 1084 Views
Um not quite
25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM
- 934 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak...
26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM
- 889 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM
- 1005 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM
- 998 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..?
26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM
- 952 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM
- 997 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity...
26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM
- 865 Views
The problem is...
26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM
- 825 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years.
27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM
- 937 Views
I already answered all this...
27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM
- 948 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong.
27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM
- 1052 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are:
26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM
- 976 Views
No problem
26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM
- 1023 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again..
26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM
- 1101 Views
Just to understand you correctly...
26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
- 941 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"?
27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM
- 1010 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right
27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM
- 965 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM
- 929 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing:
26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM
- 826 Views
One should also remember...
26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM
- 854 Views
Eh?
26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM
- 879 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM*
26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM
- 921 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart?
26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM
- 966 Views