Active Users:3265 Time:23/01/2025 03:38:12 AM
Just to understand you correctly... Etzel Send a noteboard - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM
You suggest that Moridin and SH are one creature, fused together like Luc and Isam are, but actually also Ishy and SH 0.5. were already one creature. Your evidence is that the Trollocs named Ishy Ba'alzamon, and consequently he must have a physical link to a Myrddraal. The other evidence is that the Nae'blis is just half a step below the DO, and consequently the DO would fuse himself together with his Nae'blis. Finally, Carrdin was visited by SH 0.5. but after Ishy's death, Carridin was left alone for some reason, which is obviously that Ishy and SH 0.5. were one creature.

Irrespective if this evidence is in any way convincing, or if it couldn't be explained in more reasonable ways (namely that Moridin and SH are simply closely working together and not physically linked), you have to note that if we read Moridin's or SH's PoV neither indicates at all that both are one being (if we read Isam's/Luc's it's immediately made clear that they are fused together). In the same way, the authors always distinguish between SH and Moridin in their statements. Why do you think, they would fool us that way, just for a lame twist?
Reply to message
Moridin & Shadar Haran - 22/07/2010 08:14:27 PM 1588 Views
No... - 22/07/2010 08:22:52 PM 980 Views
Re: No... - 22/07/2010 09:31:35 PM 888 Views
Re: No...(en garde, Etzellius Maximus!) - 23/07/2010 08:38:26 AM 903 Views
Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 09:17:10 AM 985 Views
Re: Well, I already talked more about it below - 23/07/2010 11:29:08 AM 838 Views
Yup, I think they are one and the same. - 23/07/2010 08:21:20 AM 1137 Views
This idea is hardly vindicable - 23/07/2010 09:12:14 AM 892 Views
Au contraire. - 23/07/2010 11:23:09 AM 989 Views
But why... - 23/07/2010 11:32:25 AM 835 Views
Re: But why... - 23/07/2010 12:01:00 PM 869 Views
Again. RJ fooled you. - 23/07/2010 12:15:26 PM 894 Views
I think it would have to work this way: - 23/07/2010 03:10:59 PM 832 Views
Your reasoning falls apart right at the start, even though there is some truth to the rest, I think. - 23/07/2010 04:22:22 PM 933 Views
Um not quite - 25/07/2010 05:47:22 AM 796 Views
Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:29:18 AM 1028 Views
Re: Hehehe. True, but the mental image still helps. - 25/07/2010 08:32:10 AM 1061 Views
I think your evidence is pretty weak... - 26/07/2010 10:14:01 AM 751 Views
Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 11:58:02 AM 850 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:18:51 PM 849 Views
Re: Why don't you answer some of the issues I raised then, instead of keeping it vague..? - 26/07/2010 12:43:53 PM 799 Views
Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 01:57:56 PM 865 Views
Re: Frankly, I don't see any similarity... - 26/07/2010 04:09:52 PM 725 Views
The problem is... - 26/07/2010 04:27:50 PM 682 Views
No problem at all, but your unwillingness to accept the possibilty after all these years. - 27/07/2010 11:38:10 AM 788 Views
I already answered all this... - 27/07/2010 11:46:36 AM 798 Views
Yeah. And as proven earlier your answers are flat-out wrong. - 27/07/2010 01:17:36 PM 907 Views
I think we have to agree to disagree - 27/07/2010 01:34:34 PM 737 Views
Agreed then. - 27/07/2010 02:03:52 PM 893 Views
Thanks for those answers. Here's how wrong they actually are: - 26/07/2010 01:54:44 PM 823 Views
No problem - 26/07/2010 02:30:45 PM 869 Views
Why does that scene matter? - 26/07/2010 04:16:33 PM 776 Views
Dunno, you have to ask Mik about this. *NM* - 26/07/2010 04:23:19 PM 419 Views
Why the half answer? Here's my full answer and the questions you missed..again.. - 26/07/2010 05:14:00 PM 954 Views
Just to understand you correctly... - 26/07/2010 05:33:46 PM 791 Views
Sure..I'll answer your questions again.. "quid pro quo"? - 27/07/2010 12:43:21 PM 867 Views
Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:27:05 PM 834 Views
Re: Well, kudos to you, if that idea turns out to be right - 27/07/2010 01:56:32 PM 725 Views
The DO has control over Moridin... - 27/07/2010 02:04:50 PM 683 Views
Uhh. Thanks ..I guess. - 27/07/2010 01:57:38 PM 901 Views
I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 03:53:04 PM 770 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 04:18:40 PM 674 Views
True, but if they're ordering other people to do it anyway... - 26/07/2010 04:51:18 PM 701 Views
One should also remember... - 26/07/2010 05:06:36 PM 708 Views
Eh? - 26/07/2010 05:30:20 PM 737 Views
But that the killing stopped, doesn't mean at all that Moridin and SH are one creature. *NM* - 26/07/2010 05:35:02 PM 778 Views
Give me a better reason? Why did RJ make the timing fit and hid it so far apart? - 26/07/2010 05:36:28 PM 816 Views
I think... - 26/07/2010 05:48:21 PM 628 Views
Re: I almost want the theory to be true, but one quick thing: - 26/07/2010 05:22:46 PM 869 Views
Re: This idea is hardly vindicable - 27/07/2010 04:07:53 PM 752 Views
= - Oh and has anyone given thought to Hopper = Bela? - 27/07/2010 09:17:18 PM 677 Views
Thanks! *bows and tips wide-brimmed hat* - 28/07/2010 07:54:05 AM 914 Views
Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 02:16:01 PM 757 Views
Re: Not the same individual - 24/07/2010 06:07:10 PM 646 Views
Aww Dom. I really hoped you were on the same page.. - 25/07/2010 09:38:35 AM 940 Views

Reply to Message