Active Users:392 Time:29/04/2025 08:47:46 AM
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules
Re: I think Datakim Send a noteboard - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM
The reason why a character, who died in a certain book, of course never got a PoV in the next books from before his death is that it would confuse many readers and just seems awkward writing, since it also doesn't advance the plot that well. If another PoV of this character were really needed, one could better include it immediately before the death in the same book; that would also better fit in the context than a jumping back in the timeline for this dead character in the next book. It could still happen, but it's highly unlikely.


I don't see it being anymore confusing than watching the Shaido (who already died once) get slaughtered again in the next book from a different perspective. We already know that there will be backtracking in the timeline with Perrin and Mat, so the readers are already prepared to the idea. A scene with Graendal which ends with her dying from a massive balefire, will be quite clear to everyone. People are not so stupid that they would be confused by that.

As for advancing the plot, there are many things that Graendals PoV could answer. Many ways that a scene from her could be used by BS for anything he wants.

I dunnno if it will happen but it could, it would not be that much more confusing than any other timejump backwards and it could advance the plot in whatever way BS/RJ wanted.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount Skeeve the Great - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2036 Views
This... Etzel - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1181 Views
how do you get there from this? darius_sedai - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1032 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: beetnemesis - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 964 Views
Because... Etzel - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 991 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan newyorkersedai - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 936 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 Rurouni_Kenshin - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 838 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. Etzel - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 961 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 943 Views
Re: the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer dacole - 14/07/2010 04:54:16 AM 889 Views
Graendal is part of several plot lines. Aran'gar at the very least is unseen in TGS, but involved darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:40:09 PM 912 Views
No... Etzel - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 833 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 808 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* Etzel - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 773 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 974 Views
Again... Etzel - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 735 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 900 Views
The point is... Etzel - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 821 Views
that is 100% your interpretation darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 856 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 764 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 764 Views
As far as we know... Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 817 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 975 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... Etzel - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 739 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 871 Views
We will see... *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1063 Views
Indeed Sidious - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 789 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... Etzel - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 974 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong dacole - 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM 856 Views
I agree regarding Graendal, but have to disagree concerning Lanfear. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 09:51:00 AM 1036 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... Sidious - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 902 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Etzel - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 969 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 857 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! Sidious - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 963 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 784 Views
where do you get this stuff from? darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 995 Views
Eh, no Etzel - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 850 Views
I disagree darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 813 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 935 Views
pure interpretation darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 872 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 936 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 377 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her Etzel - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 669 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing Sidious - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 795 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing Etzel - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 841 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing Sidious - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 796 Views
IMO... Etzel - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 742 Views
And... Etzel - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 863 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 886 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... Etzel - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 932 Views
not really darius_sedai - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1006 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 981 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 860 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 863 Views
Ok... Etzel - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 780 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 854 Views
I also just said that... Etzel - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 747 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary Datakim - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 797 Views
But we never... Etzel - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 848 Views
Re: But we never... Datakim - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 817 Views
I think Etzel - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 917 Views
Re: I think Datakim - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 913 Views
Yeah, RAFO! I predigt however, that we won't have another Graendal PoV. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:59:26 PM 832 Views
Etzel, you're making an assumption that might not be true. Logain - 16/07/2010 05:47:39 PM 944 Views
I admit the possibility, but consider it highly unlikely for the reasons I pointed out. *NM* Etzel - 16/07/2010 05:58:01 PM 906 Views
Because some people can't read... DomA - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 936 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... darius_sedai - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 731 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... Sidious - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 745 Views
Rand used so much baelfire on her that he zapped them all back to the last 3rd Age darius_sedai - 15/07/2010 01:38:48 PM 963 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* RandAllThor - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 891 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 855 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base Logain - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1007 Views
hrmm, not necessarily Kieran - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 806 Views
I agree. *NM* Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 413 Views
Uh... TaskmasterJack - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 928 Views
or "can't" because ... Shishka - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 793 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... TaskmasterJack - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 813 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 933 Views
On a somewhat related note, Sanderson says ToM consists of 80 chapters as of now. Ginormous! RandAllThor - 13/07/2010 01:54:15 AM 791 Views
Perrin catch-up? Comet Sedai - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 724 Views
We will get it on screen Deadsy - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 810 Views
On Mat's "death" Etzel - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1040 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" Datakim - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 747 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation Etzel - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 863 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation Datakim - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 895 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! Mats imaginary friend - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 810 Views
Back to Messageboard Post New Thread Search Help Stats Rules

Reply to Message

Block Quote Paragraph Quote
Formatting
Smiley Codes