Active Users:1154 Time:23/11/2024 03:25:08 AM
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* Etzel Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM
Apparently they indeed just met once very few weeks or so in TAR. Probably they also had an agreement not to attack each other (though we know that Aran'gar eventually planned for Graendal's death). In any case, since both had obviously more urgent things on their minds in the last weeks (namely Graendal Rand & Arad Doman; Aran'gar likely a new task by SH) nothing indicates that they created an elaborate plan to kill Demandred & Co. or something else, especially since it is clear that they don't trust each other that well. Likely only Aran'gar will now profit by taking over Graendal's network; on the other hand she is without an ally again, which might force Aran'gar to act sooner against Rand or the fellow Forsaken.


Graendal is supposed to be smart and crafty. This is neither on her part.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 1969 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1098 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 956 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 886 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 914 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 858 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 769 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 876 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 853 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 762 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 728 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 699 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 908 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 666 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 827 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 754 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 771 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 707 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 681 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 734 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 901 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 659 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 795 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 986 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 697 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 906 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 833 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 892 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 784 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 882 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 705 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 921 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 776 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 743 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 867 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 800 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 864 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 351 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 591 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 715 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 764 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 720 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 659 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 786 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 799 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 854 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 935 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 909 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 792 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 785 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 697 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 788 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 678 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 715 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 776 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 740 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 838 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 834 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 854 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 661 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 683 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 817 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 782 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 933 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 726 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 384 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 859 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 728 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 770 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 859 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 651 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 730 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 962 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 679 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 789 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 824 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 748 Views

Reply to Message