Active Users:1191 Time:23/11/2024 02:55:13 AM
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line darius_sedai Send a noteboard - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM
If there is such a urgent need to reveal further informations on Graendal's plans and deeds, it makes more sense that it will be revealed in the PoV of another Forsaken or SH without jumping back in Graendal's timeline, which ended in TGS, and not bring back a dead character.

Personally, I think it's absolutely clear that Graendal died of course. BS simply doesn't admit it yet, to keep some people a bit guessing.


There is absolutely no reason to believe that just because Graendal likely died in Rands timeline that she won't appear in Perrin or Mat's timeline prior to her death.


There is absolutely no reason to believe that Graendal WILL appear, because as far as we know she was concentrated on Arad Doman and Rand to fulfill Moridin's orders. There is also absolutely no indication in Perrin's or Mat's timeline, which were advanced in TGS, that Graendal played any part there.

As often said, it never happened before that a character, who died in a specific timeline, suddenly appears again in the next book in another timeline before the death. It would likely confuse many readers and is not necessary (BS also told once on his homepage that he doesn't like such flashbacks). You can naturally better advance the plot/timeline and avoid any confusion, if you simply include e.g. an Aran'gar PoV, where she muses about Graendal, her death and how Aran'gar will go one now.

For these reasons it's highly unlikely that Graendal will have another PoV yet, if she died in TGS, like also Sammael, Osan'gar or any other character never got another PoV after their death to give certain informations.


What about Noal Charin? he was almost certainly involved with Graendal at some point.

Face it you are making excuses for there to be no Graendal involvement solely because you are worried that if she crops up she'll finally admit to having killed Asmo.


And even if Noal was linked to Graendal in the past, nothing indicates that she has to appear in ToM to talk with Noal.


you keep insisting that she's somehow tied directly to Rand and only Rand... I don't think that is the case. She's got her fingers in all kinds of plots and could easily be shown involved with any number of situations ... hell it's not even inconceivable that she is behind the Borderlanders!
Domani Drag Queen in the White Tower ... Aran'gar watch out!
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 1969 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1098 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 955 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 885 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 913 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 857 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 768 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 876 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 853 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 762 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 728 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 698 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 908 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 666 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 826 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 753 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 771 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 706 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 681 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 733 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 900 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 658 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 794 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 985 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 697 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 905 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 833 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 891 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 784 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 881 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 705 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 920 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 776 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 743 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 867 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 800 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 863 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 351 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 590 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 714 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 764 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 719 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 659 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 786 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 798 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 854 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 934 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 908 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 791 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 784 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 696 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 787 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 678 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 714 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 776 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 739 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 837 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 834 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 853 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 660 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 682 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 816 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 782 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 933 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 726 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 383 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 859 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 727 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 769 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 858 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 650 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 730 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 961 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 678 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 788 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 824 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 748 Views

Reply to Message