Active Users:1230 Time:23/11/2024 02:41:29 AM
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong dacole Send a noteboard - 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM
And how this proves it can't be Grendel but you will not convince them. We both know lanfear did it but we will just have to wait for the book to be published for the rest of us to get to figure it out.


In fact, BS's answer that there are flashbacks makes is highly likely that we will get a Graendal PoV.


For example, Perrin, but also Lan or Loial.

It's complete nonsense to bring back a character that died in Rand's timeline - which is up to date - with a scene before the death; something like this also never happened before in the series. One could also argue in a similarly absurd way then that we will "likely" get another Semirhage or Elza PoV from before their deaths, just because it would be cool.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 1968 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1097 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 955 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 885 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 913 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 857 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 768 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 875 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 853 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 762 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 727 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 698 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 908 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 665 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 826 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 753 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 770 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 706 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 680 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 733 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 900 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 658 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 794 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 985 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 696 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 905 Views
give up Eztel...they think they know Asmodens killer...we know they are wrong - 13/07/2010 09:45:15 AM 804 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 832 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 891 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 783 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 881 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 705 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 920 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 776 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 743 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 866 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 800 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 863 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 350 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 590 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 714 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 764 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 719 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 659 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 785 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 798 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 853 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 934 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 908 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 791 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 784 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 696 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 787 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 677 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 714 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 775 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 739 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 837 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 833 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 853 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 660 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 682 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 816 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 782 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 932 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 726 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 383 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 858 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 727 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 769 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 858 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 650 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 729 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 961 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 678 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 788 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 824 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 748 Views

Reply to Message