Active Users:397 Time:29/04/2025 08:56:56 AM
Perrin catch-up? Comet Sedai Send a noteboard - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM
***Brandon*** Re: Will we see Rand in the next book? YES. The book will not be a 100% flash-back like Bk 10. There will be a little bit of catch-up for Perrin, but Egwene and Rand both have large parts too.


Assuming this means what I think it means, maybe we WILL get the Galad/Morgase reunion on-screen. I sure hope so. Felt royally annoyed it was glossed over in TGS.
The chief difficulty Alice found at first was in managing her flamingo.
Reply to message
Chat with Brandon posted on Dragonmount - 12/07/2010 04:23:24 PM 2037 Views
This... - 12/07/2010 04:54:28 PM 1181 Views
how do you get there from this? - 12/07/2010 05:47:42 PM 1032 Views
Right. There could easily be a scene like this: - 12/07/2010 06:22:45 PM 964 Views
Because... - 12/07/2010 10:40:29 PM 991 Views
You're brilliant, Etzel, but Brandon is NOT robert jordan - 13/07/2010 01:18:44 AM 936 Views
He said it won't be 100% flashback like book 10 - 13/07/2010 05:30:18 AM 838 Views
But obviously not for the timelines, which are up to date. - 13/07/2010 08:41:37 AM 961 Views
the only reason you say this is because you think it makes Slayer - 14/07/2010 02:39:52 AM 943 Views
No... - 14/07/2010 08:10:12 AM 833 Views
so it's not possible for anything that has never been done in the series to happen... ok - 14/07/2010 02:38:08 PM 808 Views
Again, there is no sensible reason for a scene where Graendal is shown again before her death. *NM* - 14/07/2010 04:47:21 PM 773 Views
sure there is ... to tell us she killed Asmo - 14/07/2010 04:56:09 PM 975 Views
Again... - 15/07/2010 08:57:34 AM 736 Views
or it could as easily be a scene from Aran'gar's POV that includes Graendal - 15/07/2010 01:36:21 PM 900 Views
The point is... - 15/07/2010 01:55:43 PM 822 Views
that is 100% your interpretation - 15/07/2010 02:51:49 PM 856 Views
Noal was involved with Ishy; a connection to Graendal is pure speculation. - 15/07/2010 03:19:38 PM 764 Views
I'm pointing out that she had more than just Rands plot line - 15/07/2010 03:59:36 PM 764 Views
As far as we know... - 15/07/2010 04:06:56 PM 818 Views
she also knows what Cyndane and Moghedien are up to and may be involved - 16/07/2010 01:58:36 PM 975 Views
There is nothing to support your view, that Graendal was directly involved in any other plotlines... - 16/07/2010 02:31:01 PM 740 Views
She doesn't have to be in order to make an appearance in them - 16/07/2010 03:26:44 PM 872 Views
We will see... *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:36:21 PM 1063 Views
Indeed - 13/07/2010 08:49:43 AM 790 Views
The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 09:14:04 AM 974 Views
Re: The "flashbacks" are obviously related to those characters, which aren't up to date yet... - 13/07/2010 10:03:14 AM 902 Views
It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 13/07/2010 10:25:36 AM 969 Views
you keep trotting this point out like it matters - 14/07/2010 09:07:36 PM 857 Views
a very irritating habit indeed!! - 15/07/2010 05:29:19 AM 964 Views
There is no indication that Graendal & Aran'gar did anything, except for exchanging infos! - 15/07/2010 09:01:58 AM 785 Views
where do you get this stuff from? - 15/07/2010 01:41:07 PM 995 Views
Eh, no - 15/07/2010 02:08:56 PM 851 Views
I disagree - 15/07/2010 02:56:02 PM 813 Views
Graendal actually tells that she learned interesting things from Aran'gar - 15/07/2010 03:14:54 PM 935 Views
pure interpretation - 15/07/2010 04:00:31 PM 872 Views
Well, it fits RJ's theme that the bad guys actually aren't that competent. *NM* - 15/07/2010 04:12:19 PM 936 Views
No really since it would make Aran'gar look pretty competent *NM* - 16/07/2010 03:27:40 PM 378 Views
Aran'gar just had the luck that Rand wasn't after her - 16/07/2010 03:34:53 PM 669 Views
Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 06:54:17 PM 796 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 15/07/2010 10:08:44 PM 842 Views
Re: Exchanging info is not doing nothing - 16/07/2010 05:30:25 AM 797 Views
IMO... - 16/07/2010 08:46:03 AM 742 Views
And... - 16/07/2010 11:35:44 AM 863 Views
you continue to ignore that Graendal died about 2 months after she - 16/07/2010 02:06:48 PM 887 Views
Usually the Forsaken meet in neutral TAR... - 16/07/2010 02:22:34 PM 932 Views
not really - 16/07/2010 03:58:57 PM 1006 Views
Good, then we agree, if you consider it unlikely as well. *NM* - 16/07/2010 05:56:50 PM 982 Views
Trust me, Graendal won't be seen; only her name will be mentioned a few times (as BS said). *NM* - 15/07/2010 09:03:33 AM 860 Views
You should really just write it for BS since you clearly know exactly what's going to happen - 15/07/2010 02:57:59 PM 864 Views
Ok... - 15/07/2010 03:17:02 PM 780 Views
When did I say there would be a Graendal POV? - 15/07/2010 04:03:54 PM 854 Views
I also just said that... - 15/07/2010 04:10:32 PM 747 Views
Re: It's completely unlikely and unnecessary - 14/07/2010 10:10:48 PM 797 Views
But we never... - 15/07/2010 09:17:30 AM 849 Views
Re: But we never... - 15/07/2010 10:52:24 PM 817 Views
I think - 16/07/2010 09:30:46 AM 917 Views
Re: I think - 16/07/2010 04:37:20 PM 913 Views
Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 01:05:08 PM 936 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 14/07/2010 09:14:27 PM 731 Views
Re: Because some people can't read... - 15/07/2010 05:31:22 AM 745 Views
I wonder if their big role means Rand and Eg will get more chapters than first thought. *NM* - 12/07/2010 05:27:44 PM 891 Views
Yeah, seems so. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:19:53 PM 855 Views
Brandon's "Mostly" answer makes it less likely we see the Land of Madmen as Demandred's base - 12/07/2010 07:36:49 PM 1007 Views
hrmm, not necessarily - 12/07/2010 09:28:00 PM 806 Views
I agree. *NM* - 13/07/2010 12:24:21 PM 413 Views
Uh... - 12/07/2010 10:10:08 PM 928 Views
or "can't" because ... - 12/07/2010 10:34:14 PM 793 Views
Re: or "can't" because ... - 13/07/2010 01:00:45 AM 814 Views
I think he isn't allowed to... - 13/07/2010 12:23:55 PM 933 Views
Perrin catch-up? - 13/07/2010 02:55:22 AM 725 Views
We will get it on screen - 13/07/2010 03:30:33 AM 810 Views
On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 12:34:35 PM 1040 Views
Re: On Mat's "death" - 13/07/2010 02:23:19 PM 747 Views
This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 08:23:24 AM 863 Views
Re: This report was probably a misinterpretation - 14/07/2010 10:03:36 PM 895 Views
I emailed BS and he sent me copies of both the books he mentioned in the Q&A! - 14/07/2010 08:32:58 PM 811 Views

Reply to Message