Active Users:1016 Time:18/12/2024 10:24:25 PM
Alright. Gher Send a noteboard - 29/06/2010 06:37:48 PM
If I gave my client's name or other information that would identify him or allow people to guess at his identity, I would be breaking confidence. Saying that "a client" said it is not a problem. The fact that the client doesn't care that I mention it to other people makes it even less of one. The fact that I don't touch family law makes it even less relevant.

For a communication to be privileged, it needs to be made in a setting where only the attorney and client are present, it needs to pertain to the relationship between the attorney and client (i.e., why I am representing him) and it doesn't apply if the client explicitly authorizes that it be communicated. In this case, the client said it in a large company of people, so the communication isn't even covered, technically. If it were, I don't handle family law and the client is not American and so I am not qualified to handle his divorce or marriage or similar matters anyway, so the statement would not apply to our attorney-client relationship.


I knew that it was only that specific client that could complain (or do something about it), and he doesn't sound like he much cares.


Just wondering.
"And it breaks my heart to look around, and see the unimpressed; who can't believe the emperor is dressed"~Fastball
2-7-1
Reply to message
Sanderson has finished the first draft of Towers of Midnight. *NM* - 29/06/2010 01:48:03 AM 960 Views
Dammit. - 29/06/2010 03:28:12 AM 902 Views
You didn't notice my signature line a few weeks ago, did you? - 29/06/2010 05:30:11 PM 504 Views
Completely off topic: - 29/06/2010 05:04:41 AM 788 Views
Only my client, and actually, only if I divulged enough information to break confidence. - 29/06/2010 05:31:56 PM 615 Views
Alright. - 29/06/2010 06:37:48 PM 484 Views
LOL i wondered too - 29/06/2010 08:17:56 PM 527 Views

Reply to Message