Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
Sidious Send a noteboard - 27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
I don't seem to recall any discussions of burning people at the stake in any of Roberts' posts. I would say that, mocking or not, that such a comment goes quite a bit beyond satire and toward the sort of comment that some of Terry Goodkind's more deluded fanatics have posted over the years.
No, there were no such comments in the blog. But then, I don't think Sidious meant any of it literally.
And in no way is this in anyway reminiscent of Mystar and his ilk. It is quite obvious that Sidious criticizes RJ for several things, including some things on which Adam Roberts would likely agree. He's far from a fan-boy.
As for your opinions on this, well...things do go more than one way.
Of course. Yet that kind of understanding has been completely lacking in Roberts' own posts about the series. The best he could come up with is that people liked the books for their length and the comfort that offered. I didn't see you take exception to that...
I don't think "condescending" is the word to use here. When I originally posted this thread, it was to see what discussion might occur out of it, in the now vain hope that it'd be more substantive than what has been produced. So yes, after a while, the circular nature of the arguments on all sides (I didn't exclude myself from that comment, after all) became repetitive and I mostly just posted the links out of habit than anything else.
Your initial motives are not the issue here. You say you found the discussion here circular. It was clear people here found the discussion in the blog tasteless and stupid. What could possibly be the point of posting links from each place in the other except to stoke up the heat?
By itself, that isn't even objectionable.
No, it's not hypocritical when I've been quite open about my thoughts for months now.
What's the connection? I never said you lied about your thoughts on WoT. What I said was that you spent considerable effort defending Roberts on this board, but label those who defend RJ as fan-boys, irrespective of the fact that some people had well reasoned arguments for why they found him an interesting read.
After all, why else would I comment inside the blog posts and have links where people here could read it if they so chose? And here's a question to consider: why do some feel as those their (or the dead author's) honor has been besmirched? After all, mocking or not, no one makes comments about imbeciles and burning dissidents at the stake unless there's a wee bit too much attachment to something.
Then perhaps a glance at some of Sidious's posts is in order? Because he's far from showing any undue attachment to RJ and his works. Though I suspect that, like me, he took exception to statements that WoT was bourgeois fiction that is read by people attracted to its "inherent" safety. That goes several steps beyond calling someone an imbecile, as far as I'm concerned.
It takes the "fan" part and restores the original, somewhat connotation of "fanatic" to me.
This has become such an easy way out of any discussion its becoming frustrating. It is one thing to call someone who goes to various sites and defends his pet author and insults his detractors a fanatic. It is quite something else to level the same accusation at any and everyone who thinks some popular genre author is great.
Perhaps I'm just too cynical to see the point in all this and should just bow out of such discussions in the future.
Maybe. Clearly, you have a standard set on what is good fiction and what is not. And after going through your comments in Roberts' blog, it seems clear you have no issues with characterizing some with different standards as people with poor taste (not in so many words, but the implication is rather clear).
From the beginning I've considered this post to be borderline trolling. Posting reviews by an author who disdains Robert Jordan's work on a site dedicated to those works is counter-productive to start with. In fact, Roberts negative reviews in themselves aren't themselves objectionable, but rather his clear attempt to obtain approval using jibes and sarcasm. It's attention-seeking at its base level. Readers who know WoT far better than I do, such as DomA, have made eloquent posts showing factually that Roberts makes almost no valid points regarding his criticism of the series, and even worse, by forming erroneous parallels doesn't understand fantasy in general.
The fact that Larry took the effort to actually link my post to Roberts' blog is a clear indication that he wants to ignite conflict on this, and perhaps both, boards. If I wanted him to read what I thought of him, I would have posted something there. I'm sure Roberts will eventually reply with some or other nasty remark - he has little else to offer. However, if Larry is anxiously hoping for some cross-board escalation to occur, he's sadly mistaken.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Fan of Lanfear
Author Adam Roberts tackled the WoT.
19/03/2010 09:30:25 PM
- 12265 Views
Heh, While I agree with him about it being derivative, I still encourage people to read it.
20/03/2010 02:36:47 AM
- 2088 Views
My problem with the reviews:
20/03/2010 06:29:08 AM
- 2731 Views
Hear Hear !!! ....................... = ........................ *NM*
20/03/2010 06:37:11 AM
- 1310 Views
well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 06:51:29 AM
- 2481 Views
Re: well I agree and disagree
20/03/2010 02:12:43 PM
- 2017 Views
I'm amused by some of the responses
20/03/2010 07:20:03 PM
- 2418 Views
Are you suggesting that we are unqualified to disagree with him ?
20/03/2010 11:21:44 PM
- 2173 Views
No, I said rather that it's ridiculous to make such disparaging comments about his takes
20/03/2010 11:37:56 PM
- 2180 Views
I will reply to myself: What's the problem McFly , chicken ?
21/03/2010 12:29:36 AM
- 1972 Views
My sister called me chicken once
10/04/2010 01:18:31 AM
- 2010 Views
Re: I'm amused by some of the responses
23/03/2010 04:50:42 PM
- 2061 Views
And I'm even more amused by this response
24/03/2010 01:11:50 AM
- 2005 Views
On a completely unrelated note...
24/03/2010 06:15:25 AM
- 1854 Views
Ha!
24/03/2010 06:34:48 AM
- 1912 Views
My congratulations then . *NM*
24/03/2010 06:36:11 AM
- 1825 Views
Wow, you guys have completely missed the point of the Wheel of Time series
22/03/2010 05:28:07 PM
- 2056 Views
There's a point to it?
22/03/2010 06:47:12 PM
- 2023 Views
Yes, RJ has explained it at least a few times and the main sequence of each book invokes his message *NM*
24/03/2010 02:09:01 AM
- 1280 Views
You're not taking me seriously now, are you?
24/03/2010 02:54:37 AM
- 1968 Views
I meant the reason why RJ wrote WoT in the first place
24/03/2010 06:39:47 AM
- 1922 Views
And which, arguably, could be viewed as being done in a hackneyed way
24/03/2010 07:15:55 AM
- 1984 Views
I thought the point was to write about a bunch of stuff happening?
09/04/2010 03:42:49 PM
- 2014 Views
pfft wth-ever
26/03/2010 12:35:53 AM
- 1829 Views
Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
26/03/2010 12:28:19 PM
- 2083 Views
bla bla bla
29/03/2010 06:17:07 AM
- 1946 Views
Wow. That post was more entertaining than Mr. Roberts' review. Thank you *NM*
29/03/2010 08:23:41 AM
- 1448 Views
You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 08:54:03 AM
- 1873 Views
Re: You must have low standards for entertainment
29/03/2010 09:13:44 AM
- 1987 Views
I know you were, thus the at the least of my comment
29/03/2010 09:19:30 AM
- 1841 Views
Unimpressed
29/03/2010 10:50:07 PM
- 2262 Views
Isn't that a bit uncharitable, Dom, considering how much you approved of what I did with CoT?
30/03/2010 12:03:48 AM
- 2277 Views
Re: Dude's been up for more awards for his writing than RJ ever was
29/03/2010 04:32:23 PM
- 1972 Views
Might want to re-read their Wikis again.
29/03/2010 07:07:11 PM
- 1881 Views
Awards
29/03/2010 07:42:03 PM
- 1838 Views
That link is out of date
29/03/2010 07:54:56 PM
- 1814 Views
Re: That link is out of date
29/03/2010 08:22:03 PM
- 1933 Views
This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 08:47:54 PM
- 1851 Views
Re: This is a battle of win/lose?
29/03/2010 09:03:07 PM
- 1900 Views
*considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:28:06 PM
- 1880 Views
Re: *considers employing the Chewbacca defense*
29/03/2010 09:44:58 PM
- 2029 Views
The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 12:24:56 AM
- 1769 Views
Re: The final point explains the "defense"
30/03/2010 01:33:04 PM
- 1764 Views
No, no, no
30/03/2010 06:38:41 PM
- 1823 Views
Re: No, no, no
30/03/2010 07:51:34 PM
- 1934 Views
Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 02:10:13 AM
- 1881 Views
Re: Still continuing, huh?
31/03/2010 03:56:57 PM
- 1835 Views
He's now reviewed the third book
26/03/2010 12:27:16 PM
- 2080 Views
Well, this time I must disagree with him .
29/03/2010 07:31:40 AM
- 1810 Views
I don't think he was claiming that RJ was alone in doing that
29/03/2010 07:44:07 AM
- 1778 Views
Hah!
29/03/2010 06:07:28 PM
- 1832 Views
Well...
29/03/2010 06:52:10 PM
- 1751 Views
Differing perspectives, I guess.
29/03/2010 07:58:13 PM
- 1890 Views
I suppose
29/03/2010 08:50:43 PM
- 1806 Views
Re: I suppose
30/03/2010 12:18:30 AM
- 1968 Views
Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 12:52:01 AM
- 1748 Views
Re: Hey, DomA, do you know why the Shienarans randomly speak in the Old Tongue?
30/03/2010 07:45:08 AM
- 1959 Views
But why only them?
30/03/2010 08:07:00 AM
- 1851 Views
The Shadow Rising review
02/04/2010 09:42:53 AM
- 2063 Views
I wonder if this borders on trolling
02/04/2010 02:29:58 PM
- 10608 Views
That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 09:16:25 PM
- 2080 Views
Re: That would be a mistake
02/04/2010 10:28:56 PM
- 1808 Views
I agree, Roberts is more and more coming across to me as just bitter
10/04/2010 01:24:52 AM
- 1950 Views
Little late to this one as well
10/04/2010 11:12:04 AM
- 1970 Views
Perhaps you should have led with this bit
10/04/2010 02:52:23 PM
- 2017 Views
I guess I just presumed that people would read the header to his blog
12/04/2010 03:54:10 AM
- 1892 Views
What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 08:00:45 PM
- 2039 Views
Re: What review? I couldn't find one...
02/04/2010 09:22:13 PM
- 2014 Views
See my comment below
02/04/2010 09:32:54 PM
- 2095 Views
Re: See my comment below
03/04/2010 09:31:22 AM
- 2426 Views
Sorry I'm late in responding, but I've been quite busy this week
07/04/2010 09:45:48 PM
- 2258 Views
Speaking of irritation
02/04/2010 10:50:04 PM
- 2017 Views
To be fair, even among the RaFOers there have been tons of posts that missed certain events
09/04/2010 03:47:30 PM
- 1838 Views
Commentary, then?
02/04/2010 09:27:18 PM
- 1833 Views
Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:11:18 PM
- 1831 Views
Re: Here's the thing...
02/04/2010 10:31:56 PM
- 1686 Views
Re: Commentary, then?
05/04/2010 03:44:07 PM
- 1824 Views
for a man that bitterly complains about an author who is padding his work
08/04/2010 09:41:07 PM
- 2005 Views
1400 words is long-winded?
09/04/2010 10:07:41 AM
- 2026 Views
since you can sum up those 1400 words in about 25 yes that's longwinded
09/04/2010 01:36:16 PM
- 1900 Views
Except I didn't really sum it up, as I left out quite a bit
10/04/2010 11:15:42 AM
- 1960 Views
You are very defensive over this
10/04/2010 01:54:15 PM
- 1734 Views
Nah, more of a devil's advocate than anything else
12/04/2010 03:57:12 AM
- 1812 Views
Well Larry I have started reading Gradsil by Adam Roberts
07/04/2010 08:59:28 PM
- 1957 Views
I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
07/04/2010 09:50:39 PM
- 1825 Views
Re: I demand a paragraph by paragraph review, with footnotes!
08/04/2010 01:06:20 PM
- 1704 Views
Which Invisible Man?
09/04/2010 09:58:44 AM
- 1922 Views
He brings up some interesting points, if in an unnecessarily rude manner
08/04/2010 12:42:25 PM
- 1886 Views
To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 10:05:49 AM
- 1891 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
09/04/2010 01:28:17 PM
- 2436 Views
Re: To be honest, I doubt most readers of the series obsess over it that much
10/04/2010 11:40:22 AM
- 1868 Views
why are you so bothered by people being unimpressed with Roberts?
10/04/2010 02:19:08 PM
- 1884 Views
Not bothered as much as I am bemused by the ad hominems, to be honest
12/04/2010 04:11:12 AM
- 2183 Views
And in vol. 5, Roberts discovers the horrors of the circus
09/04/2010 09:57:03 AM
- 1847 Views
Basically he just states the "nothing happens"-argument...
09/04/2010 03:26:02 PM
- 1747 Views
Well, what was really resolved here?
10/04/2010 11:25:25 AM
- 1825 Views
Well...
12/04/2010 05:05:20 PM
- 1929 Views
So very little was resolved and much was set into motion, then?
12/04/2010 06:55:45 PM
- 1935 Views
Yes...
12/04/2010 10:51:08 PM
- 1660 Views
Ever read Umberto Eco's How To Travel with a Salmon?
12/04/2010 11:07:19 PM
- 1962 Views
I guess...
13/04/2010 10:03:03 AM
- 1962 Views
Sounds like you value prolixity for the sake of prolixity, to be honest
13/04/2010 04:41:07 PM
- 3103 Views
Nah...
13/04/2010 05:29:34 PM
- 1694 Views
He's read and enjoyed Proust, among others
13/04/2010 07:37:39 PM
- 1768 Views
Ah, well...
13/04/2010 09:45:45 PM
- 1723 Views
Dismissive, much?
13/04/2010 10:52:30 PM
- 1862 Views
About that bifurcation...
14/04/2010 02:02:15 AM
- 1832 Views
Sorry that I was busy yesterday and didn't have a chance to reply until now
15/04/2010 01:46:54 PM
- 1955 Views
I'm sorry, but he's totally right. "The Circus" made me put down this series for 5 YEARS.
09/04/2010 03:38:16 PM
- 1831 Views
Lord of Chaos commentary
16/04/2010 03:39:39 PM
- 1824 Views
No no. It was Lord of Heaven!
16/04/2010 05:51:11 PM
- 1740 Views
Yeah, I noticed that
16/04/2010 11:16:26 PM
- 1663 Views
I would love the see him review Goodkind...
16/04/2010 11:51:07 PM
- 1846 Views
I don't wish that on anyone who doesn't have copious amounts of alcohol
16/04/2010 11:57:41 PM
- 1805 Views
A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
23/04/2010 08:36:17 AM
- 1948 Views
Re: A Crown of Swords - or is it deco-porn?
29/04/2010 06:02:28 PM
- 1887 Views
I disagree
29/04/2010 09:34:49 PM
- 1700 Views
The Path of Daggers commentary
07/05/2010 10:39:03 AM
- 1976 Views
Winter's Heart
21/05/2010 12:46:14 PM
- 1965 Views
I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
21/05/2010 04:49:31 PM
- 1822 Views
Re: I think WH was my least favorite of the WoT novels I re-read
25/05/2010 05:05:09 PM
- 1986 Views
WH was my least favorite novel in the series, and that is saying a lot.
28/05/2010 03:15:13 PM
- 1875 Views
I completely agree with his KoD post. Here is my favorite quote:
28/05/2010 03:08:31 PM
- 2148 Views
Roberts reflects back on WoT 1-11, with answers to questions asked of him
25/06/2010 12:51:29 PM
- 1938 Views
This guy should be burned at the stake
25/06/2010 03:22:34 PM
- 9358 Views
Are you done making a fool out of yourself, Mark?
26/06/2010 06:53:37 PM
- 1876 Views
Oh come on...
26/06/2010 09:06:01 PM
- 1955 Views
Well, the burning at the stake was a bit much...
26/06/2010 10:19:40 PM
- 1974 Views
Well, really! You brought the comment to his notice...
26/06/2010 11:34:08 PM
- 1979 Views
And your point is...?
27/06/2010 12:37:00 AM
- 1999 Views
Well...
27/06/2010 05:38:12 AM
- 1955 Views
Indeed... I think it's rather clear that Larry's goal has been to cause trouble
27/06/2010 10:57:36 AM
- 2091 Views
It's not about honour being beschmirched. It's about poor quality arguments. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:09:23 PM
- 1137 Views
One year later...
27/03/2011 03:40:29 AM
- 1813 Views
Re: One year later...
28/03/2011 05:03:32 PM
- 2018 Views
I see you subconsciously support critical takes.
28/03/2011 11:41:48 PM
- 2028 Views
No I conciously support telling you and him that you are pathetic, arrogent, & jelous. *NM*
30/03/2011 01:40:36 PM
- 1174 Views
Jealous?
30/03/2011 05:20:32 PM
- 1815 Views
You both are jelous of Jordan's tremendous succes.
30/03/2011 10:27:36 PM
- 1837 Views
Please learn how to spell the word "jealous" before tossing it about in the cavalier fashion you do
30/03/2011 10:54:36 PM
- 1843 Views
The fact that you teach is supposed to be a surprise?
31/03/2011 01:23:45 PM
- 1771 Views
After reading the standard-issue checklist of generic, tossabout pejoratives...
01/04/2011 03:06:18 PM
- 1911 Views
I agree, I didn't even notice it was an old post, definitely did not deserve to be revived. *NM*
30/03/2011 02:41:12 PM
- 1098 Views
Now I notice as well that this is a year old. You're very silly, Larry, very silly. *NM*
30/03/2011 04:13:38 PM
- 1227 Views
Yep!
30/03/2011 05:16:38 PM
- 1751 Views
He's not an "author", he's just a stupid troll, do not feed him *NM*
30/03/2011 02:39:19 PM
- 1112 Views