I'm confused here. I'm certain you don't mean Roberts is allowed the mocking tone, but Sidious is not, simple because RJ cannot read Roberts' comments. Even if that were so, the author's attention was drawn to this comment by you, in a manner that I found less than savory.

If your aim was not the fan any fires, posting Roberts views here, and the reader's responses there was hardly the way to go about it. And your characterization of the comments here as repetitive and targeting you in a negative way is condescending. Quite a few people had excellent points regarding the repetitive nature of Roberts' views as well as the absence of the elements of what can be called a good review. You chose to defend him, vigorously at times, because your views are not very different from his.

Its pure hypocrisy that you do so, while at the same time making critical comments about how people have defended RJ here in this post.