Active Users:733 Time:15/11/2024 01:04:30 AM
Re: First chapters: How do they stack up? ajfurst Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 04:44:20 AM
All in all, and getting serious here, folks (assuming your sarcasm detectors have not been reduced to smoldering circuitry by now), I think anyone who is disappointed with any perceived lack of action or significant events in "Tears of Steel" can just shut their pieholes. WoT is the quintessential old dog, and will not be learning any new "first chapter excitement" tricks anytime soon. It's less than fifty days until we get to read chapter two, so stop fussing.

Love,
Cannoli


Well put.

If I was rating first chapters of WOT books on the criteria of action that happens in that chapter (not someone has/will arrive so the next chapter will have action) and/or information imparted to the reader, then The Shadow Rising would be a clear top (and that's a special case with no prologue) with Tears of Steel in the top 3 or 4 (I'd rate it a clear no. 2, with everything that's brought up to speed plus the new points of debate).
Reply to message
First chapters: How do they stack up? - 08/09/2009 02:34:31 AM 632 Views
LOL. Hear hear. Though, a lot of work for a simple point. *NM* - 08/09/2009 02:50:54 AM 156 Views
But for many, probably necessary. A job well done, IMO. *NM* - 10/09/2009 09:32:08 PM 309 Views
High Chasaline (ACOS) is (imo) the most useless first chapter by far - 08/09/2009 04:03:30 AM 388 Views
Re: First chapters: How do they stack up? - 08/09/2009 04:44:20 AM 379 Views
The action will be in the prologue... it always is *NM* - 08/09/2009 05:25:09 AM 124 Views
Yeah, but some people haven't figured that out. - 08/09/2009 02:27:51 PM 358 Views
Love, Cannoli? God man... - 08/09/2009 05:33:32 AM 461 Views
Squeezing in all the sarcasm I can - 08/09/2009 02:28:35 PM 965 Views
Not bad. Very thorough. *NM* - 08/09/2009 04:06:55 PM 130 Views

Reply to Message