Active Users:2567 Time:23/01/2025 02:01:03 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1210 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 684 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 710 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 629 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 629 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 685 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 673 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 633 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 605 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 655 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 749 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 636 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 601 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 568 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 665 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 564 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 537 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 621 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 757 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 693 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 622 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 618 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 626 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 582 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 568 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1073 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 647 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 604 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 556 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 598 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 567 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 661 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 635 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 607 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 580 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 594 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 553 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 633 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 676 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 667 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 597 Views

Reply to Message