Active Users:753 Time:03/04/2025 05:25:57 AM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1258 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 733 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 766 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 679 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 675 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 734 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 724 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 680 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 657 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 708 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 808 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 684 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 652 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 616 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 696 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 618 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 582 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 671 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 807 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 743 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 669 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 664 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 677 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 632 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 614 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1120 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 697 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 648 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 601 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 648 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 613 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 718 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 688 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 656 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 633 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 640 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 604 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 679 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 734 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 718 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 647 Views

Reply to Message