Active Users:368 Time:26/04/2025 03:59:21 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1262 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 739 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 774 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 684 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 681 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 743 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 728 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 685 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 661 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 717 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 822 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 691 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 662 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 622 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 701 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 623 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 588 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 675 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 811 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 749 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 673 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 670 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 684 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 636 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 620 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1126 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 706 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 654 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 607 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 654 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 618 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 724 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 693 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 663 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 638 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 644 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 608 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 685 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 738 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 722 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 653 Views

Reply to Message