Active Users:1255 Time:23/02/2025 07:34:27 PM
Ockham's Razor Kieran Send a noteboard - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM
Ok let's look at this again,

Name of possible source: Artur Paendrag Tanreall

Name of character he is a type and shadow of: Arthur Pendragon

Arthur means: Long Bear.
Pendragon means: Head of the dragon.

Arthur's father Uther Pendraon's banner: Golden Dragon

Of course we know that Rand AL'THOR also draws symbolism from Mr sword in the stone. Does that mean that only he can have a dragon banner? No, of course not, several of the characters in the WoT world draw from the same sources. If fact even from Arthurian legends there were several people who have a dragon on their banner. Since a particular animal generally is put on a banner to claim a certain characteristic for it's owner, it seems inevitable that the dragon will come up multiple times.

So anyway...maybe thats why he would have a sword with the symbol of the person he symbolizes.
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1242 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 719 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 752 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 663 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 661 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 715 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 706 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 664 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 636 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 692 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 779 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 663 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 639 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 599 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 677 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 603 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 566 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 654 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 785 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 726 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 654 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 650 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 660 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 614 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 599 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1102 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 682 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 633 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 584 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 632 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 598 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 701 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 671 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 638 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 617 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 623 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 587 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 663 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 714 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 700 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 631 Views

Reply to Message