Re: "he would have had no need to cut her weaves"
Skeeve the Great Send a noteboard - 15/06/2010 09:03:39 PM
In my books, if you can't shield someone (because the other one is so strong, or because your weave is so weak it can be cut, or anything else) it means you can't shield someone. Period.
No three women could block him from the Source...
15/06/2010 06:52:17 PM
- 1962 Views
I think that is total BS, since the books have proved otherwise more than once...
15/06/2010 07:22:16 PM
- 1050 Views
I think he means that it would take three such women to smother him
15/06/2010 07:45:03 PM
- 1111 Views
Re: I think that is total BS, since the books have proved otherwise more than once...
15/06/2010 08:17:47 PM
- 1065 Views
Huh?
15/06/2010 08:19:21 PM
- 1170 Views
Re: Huh?
15/06/2010 08:31:17 PM
- 992 Views
15/06/2010 08:43:12 PM
- 1076 Views
Re:
15/06/2010 08:47:05 PM
- 890 Views
No, this is before.
15/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
- 975 Views
Well that's a different quote from the one you used before, and this one shows Lanfear not succeedin
15/06/2010 08:52:00 PM
- 978 Views
I never used a quote before. And there's no quote where Lanfear's shield is not succeeding.
15/06/2010 08:52:28 PM
- 848 Views
Simple answer to settle it:
15/06/2010 09:00:22 PM
- 866 Views
So Talaan is God?
15/06/2010 09:04:44 PM
- 1029 Views
It Rand had half Lews Therin's skill at the time, she would stand no chance..SKILL was her advantage
15/06/2010 09:08:41 PM
- 980 Views
So?
15/06/2010 09:15:01 PM
- 946 Views
Nope, YOU said he was talking about smothering him, whatever that's supposed to mean...
15/06/2010 09:26:53 PM
- 901 Views
You do know that this was AFTER Lanfear had picked up the bracelet angreal, right?
15/06/2010 08:49:47 PM
- 949 Views
Nope. 6 Aes Sedai couldn't take Raolain Darksbane or Yurian Stonebow...Semirhage = 3 Aes Sedai
15/06/2010 08:26:21 PM
- 912 Views
Lanfear can do it alone
15/06/2010 08:45:09 PM
- 919 Views
She ATTEMPTS to cut him off, when he is not at full strength or full training yet...
15/06/2010 08:55:39 PM
- 882 Views
Plus, Rand was splitting his flows, IIRC. Meaning he wasn't 100% one-on-one with her.
15/06/2010 08:57:35 PM
- 907 Views
She was splitting her flows too... she was slicing his weaves of Air.
15/06/2010 08:59:00 PM
- 941 Views
Bah!
15/06/2010 08:58:26 PM
- 910 Views
I repeat: You cannot shield someone unless you are significantly stronger than they are...
15/06/2010 09:02:55 PM
- 863 Views
Explain Talaan shielding Nynaeve then. Or the two BA shielding her.
15/06/2010 09:05:21 PM
- 1847 Views
It becomes a battle of skill then...
15/06/2010 09:09:42 PM
- 1024 Views
Then by your own definition you do not have to be significantly stronger to shield someone
15/06/2010 11:28:44 PM
- 911 Views
Re: "he would have had no need to cut her weaves"
15/06/2010 09:03:39 PM
- 872 Views
Oh come on...
15/06/2010 08:48:56 PM
- 1077 Views
I know you are not that ignorant...
15/06/2010 09:07:02 PM
- 854 Views
But that isn't true...
15/06/2010 09:10:37 PM
- 896 Views
Let me spell it out for you...
15/06/2010 09:18:04 PM
- 903 Views
Re: Let me spell it out for you...
15/06/2010 09:21:02 PM
- 888 Views
+1. It ridiculous comparison. Rand even didn't know how to shield a woman.
15/06/2010 09:22:22 PM
- 937 Views
Now that's a ridiculous comparison
15/06/2010 09:24:45 PM
- 1026 Views
Touchy point, heh?
15/06/2010 09:28:47 PM
- 980 Views
Then how come Lanfear never died? We know she made attempts to capture him.
15/06/2010 09:31:20 PM
- 947 Views
Whom? LTT? Can you elaborate?
15/06/2010 09:33:25 PM
- 1003 Views
If you wish...
15/06/2010 09:34:38 PM
- 753 Views
Re: If you wish...
15/06/2010 09:36:30 PM
- 771 Views
Whyever not?
15/06/2010 09:39:22 PM
- 841 Views
Re: Whyever not?
15/06/2010 09:41:22 PM
- 722 Views
Even in that situation
15/06/2010 09:43:04 PM
- 990 Views
Re: Even in that situation
15/06/2010 09:47:36 PM
- 1001 Views
Okay...
15/06/2010 09:59:36 PM
- 941 Views
Re: Okay...
15/06/2010 10:39:01 PM
- 929 Views
So, if it doesn't agree with your view, its fuzzy, even when that is what the books say? *NM*
15/06/2010 10:42:48 PM
- 547 Views
What?
15/06/2010 10:45:16 PM
- 858 Views
If we use your interpretation of the statements. *NM*
15/06/2010 10:49:21 PM
- 456 Views
Re: If we use your interpretation of the statements.
15/06/2010 10:54:48 PM
- 792 Views
Okay, here's what I think you're saying...
15/06/2010 11:00:19 PM
- 956 Views
Hehehe! Classic. Maybe his hands were full of her...err..Globes of Fire...
15/06/2010 09:47:35 PM
- 855 Views
It's like women's tennis. Put the best up against a middling men's tennis player and they lose. *NM*
16/06/2010 12:18:06 AM
- 379 Views
Re: No three women could block him from the Source...
16/06/2010 04:00:00 PM
- 845 Views
I disagree.
16/06/2010 04:03:52 PM
- 1004 Views
I'd like to think Egwene, Elayne and Aviendha could
17/06/2010 04:19:22 PM
- 838 Views
Agreed
17/06/2010 05:59:39 PM
- 742 Views
They might be able to, but then they are not 3 women of <b>average AS</b> strength
17/06/2010 07:10:14 PM
- 886 Views
They would be far more than 3 average AS
17/06/2010 08:07:30 PM
- 898 Views
Another related quote
18/06/2010 07:49:33 PM
- 894 Views
well, in the same book about 5 minutes after Lanfear almost kicks Rands ass
18/06/2010 08:11:49 PM
- 936 Views