I'm not the one being psychotic. I'm taking what he said with no reinterpretation. You're the one putting a spin on it to support your theory. Stop accusing me of what you're doing.
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount
10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM
- 2200 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking!
10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM
- 1125 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength...
10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM
- 1001 Views
See the question again man!
10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM
- 961 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman...
10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM
- 1039 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing!
10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM
- 974 Views
Think logically for a moment...
10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM
- 819 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine?
10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM
- 1064 Views
Aviendha did in FoH...
10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM
- 820 Views
Nope!
10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM
- 982 Views
Your quotes are faulty
10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM
- 994 Views
In what sense though?
10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM
- 985 Views
Forkroot
10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM
- 920 Views
Again... later that night?
10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM
- 766 Views
What do you mean?
10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM
- 970 Views
See below...
10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM
- 885 Views
Re: See below...
10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM
- 931 Views
I just did.
10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM
- 748 Views
Well then we disagree
10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM
- 948 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT!
10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM
- 799 Views
Ah, you mean later later ...
10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM
- 893 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know?
10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM
- 993 Views
Yes I know
10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM
- 983 Views
I've explained it before in this thread...
10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM
- 971 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM
- 962 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM
- 898 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread...
10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM
- 926 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine?
10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM
- 993 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe?
10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM
- 811 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ!
10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM
- 889 Views
In that case, there is no problem...
10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM
- 859 Views
But that isn't what the text says...
10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM
- 769 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then?
10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM
- 971 Views
Yeah, both were RJ
10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM
- 878 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate.
10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM
- 976 Views
10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM
- 947 Views
Really?
10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM
- 826 Views
Re: Really?
10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM
- 932 Views
Here's what is clear:
10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM
- 864 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove
10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM
- 853 Views
Dude...
10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM
- 772 Views
At least we agree on one thing
10/06/2010 09:29:14 PM
- 863 Views
yet 4 women can still hold Rand in LoC ... he can't break the Shield until it's down to 3
13/06/2010 12:47:43 PM
- 702 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point
11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM
- 805 Views
The rate forkroot wears off?
16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM
- 907 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all!
16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM
- 824 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this...
10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM
- 701 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did.
10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM
- 835 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off...
10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM
- 800 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield...
10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM
- 813 Views
Easy...
10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM
- 781 Views
What has that got to do with it?
10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM
- 964 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half..
10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM
- 869 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who...
10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM
- 1012 Views
I can agree with that.
10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM
- 770 Views
...
10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM
- 752 Views
Agreed, but...
10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM
- 924 Views
Re: Agreed, but...
10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM
- 722 Views
Good point...
10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM
- 941 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list...
10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM
- 808 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense
10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM
- 742 Views
Uhhh?
10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM
- 756 Views
Re: Uhhh?
10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM
- 756 Views
DUDE!
10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM
- 784 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily...
10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM
- 1346 Views
That's fairly simple, actually...
10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM
- 980 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai...
10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM
- 957 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM*
10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM
- 469 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right...
10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM
- 1007 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages...
10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM
- 800 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them...
10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM
- 817 Views
Very poor evidence
10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM
- 923 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined
11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM
- 874 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined...
11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM
- 930 Views
Here's the problem with that...
11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM
- 782 Views
I think you are misreading her.
10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM
- 724 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM*
10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM
- 507 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution.
10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM
- 964 Views
Yes. You can't extrapolate a generalized macro level scale to micro level individuals.
11/06/2010 12:16:24 AM
- 810 Views
I don't agree
10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
- 795 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you.
10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM
- 900 Views
Hmm...
10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM
- 713 Views
Because of the question to which she responded...
10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM
- 753 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded...
10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM
- 883 Views
Without contradicting the latter...
10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM
- 784 Views
Ah well
10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM
- 749 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified!
10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM
- 1004 Views
Nope...
10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM
- 855 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50?
10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM
- 887 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55?
10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM
- 758 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys!
10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM
- 699 Views
Amys can't hold her properly
10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM
- 727 Views
What about later that night?
10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM
- 720 Views
No she didn't
16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM
- 853 Views
No she didn't what?
16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM
- 908 Views
Re: No she didn't what?
17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM
- 741 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale?
16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM
- 873 Views
That's simple...
16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM
- 825 Views
Re: That's simple...
16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM
- 773 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it.
16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM
- 964 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body.
10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM
- 806 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new
10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM
- 943 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before
10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM
- 1021 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing
11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM
- 774 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing...
10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM
- 1053 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second...
10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM
- 781 Views
That still proves my point...
10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM
- 956 Views
Re: That still proves my point...
10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM
- 808 Views
Then why...
10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM
- 901 Views
Re: Then why...
10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM
- 769 Views
God, what stupidity!
10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM
- 767 Views
Re: God, what stupidity!
10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM
- 874 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100.
10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM
- 829 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100.
10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM
- 1093 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility...
10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM
- 918 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations.
11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM
- 857 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM
- 845 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM
- 962 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off.
11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM
- 889 Views
I agree
11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM
- 1006 Views
Re: I agree
12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM
- 787 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out"
12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM
- 816 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM*
13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM
- 482 Views
Actually she said "No"... *NM*
13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM
- 573 Views
I'll rephrase then. It was about Maria saying that she considered giving a RAFO on the question.
13/06/2010 01:44:19 AM
- 818 Views
Eh, practically useless.
14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM
- 791 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM*
15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM
- 453 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though.
17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM
- 1358 Views