Active Users:666 Time:18/04/2025 10:42:44 PM
I don't agree Sidious Send a noteboard - 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM
Focusing strictly on the One Power Strength questions and answers...


9. Question--In [LoC; 30, To Heal Again - 617] Siuan, after being healed, says to Nynaeve that ‘if she could heal her to half of what she was’ she would be better off. This has led to the perception that Siuan and Leane are less than half their original strength. Yet in [CoT; 19, Surprises – 459] we find out that both women stand several steps above the Aes Sedai minimum strength. This seems problematic—the range of Aes Sedai strength does not appear to be so great as to allow for this. So the question is, did Siuan and Leane in fact lose such a large amount of strength as they appear to have?

Maria Answers--Yes, they did lose a large amount of strength. The range of strength is greater than you think, I believe. At the beginning, Siuan was near the top (and Leane close behind); if she were half the strength she used to be, she’d be in the middle. Instead, she’s somewhere in the lower half, but not absolute rock bottom, nor nearly as low as Daigian Moseneillin.

...

20. Question--Is strength in the power evenly distributed? Would on a scale of one to one hundred the most channelers be on the 50 mark? (within a gender, of course).

Maria Answers--Jim described it as a bell curve, with most channelers in the middle.

21. Question--Of the really strong channelers we know the nature to, all but one have been sparkers. This has led to the belief that sparkers are on average stronger than learners. Is this belief justified?

Maria Answers--No. “Having been born with the inherent spark apparently is not an indicator of strength. There are as many with weak potential who will channel whether they are taught or not as there are of great potential” (from Jim’s notes). The stronger ones just get more attention.

22. Question--Do stronger sparkers stand a better chance of surviving touching the Source unaided?

Maria Answers--It depends on what you mean by “stronger” sparkers. If you mean strength in the One Power, not really. If you mean strength of will or character, perhaps. Jim said of touching the One Power unaided: “if you have not learned some sort of rough control, conscious or not, you will die screaming and writhing in agony.”


The most earth shattering revelation, in my opinion, is Maria's answer to question 20. For YEARS, and it has been years for many of us, we've debated how the curve looked.

This confirms that the bell curve peaks at 50 on a scale of 0 to 100. This means we need to redo ALL of our one power strength estimates.

For example, Moiraine must have 50+ strength, putting people like Elayne/Aviendha/Egwene somewhere around 60+

This also means we have to throw out previous shielding theories (as a measure of one power strength) and create new models for strength based on shielding.

For example, Rand knows that no three regular AS can shield him, but he might be in trouble if one was (I forget which forsaken he names). Anyway, my point is that 3 average Aes Sedai are going to average at least 150 power. Yet, Rand knows 150 power against his sub-100 power will never defeat him. I say sub-100 because when Rand makes the comment about 3 AS shielding him he still grows some after that comment. So when Rand made the comment he was less than full potential.

I need time to digest all the implications of Maria's answers and time to rethink/create a new One Power strength model.

Maybe


Maria said that channeling strength is a bell curve. She did not confirm that it's between 1 and 100, with the peak around 50. I believe it to be a bell curve from levels 1 to 21, with most women having a strength of levels 10-12.

She didn't give any new info. RJ told us years ago that he placed strength on a bell curve.

I believe that the bell curve for strength is much like height. It peaks at 5'5-6', but that doesn't mean that the tallest person is 10' and the shortest 0'. That's just a simple analogy, but I believe strength peaks at level 10-12, which should correspond to a strength of about 10-20 out of a 100. There are women on their side with lower and higher strengths.

If most women peaked at 50 with a maximum strength of 100, RJ would be hard pressed to prove it with his own series. Considering Rand says that no three women could match him unless one of them was close to maximum strength, it's nonsensical to think that two together equal a woman of maximum power. Egwene was well above Amys and Melaine in power in FoH, and Moiraine thought she'd need Aviendha's assistance to stand against a Forsaken. Therefore if RJ did make a system like he claimed with women hovering around an average of 50/100, it will go down as the worst described magic system in history.
Wheel of Time board admin
Fan of Lanfear
Reply to message
Several good MAFOs from Dragonmount - 10/06/2010 07:07:55 PM 2284 Views
Some good RAFOs here - 10/06/2010 07:31:56 PM 1034 Views
Yeah... - 10/06/2010 07:36:55 PM 923 Views
Maria's answer to question 20 is ground-breaking! - 10/06/2010 07:36:40 PM 1210 Views
No, it merely means that the Bell Curve does not refer to absolute strength... - 10/06/2010 07:42:31 PM 1071 Views
See the question again man! - 10/06/2010 07:48:57 PM 1040 Views
That contradicts your assertion that Moiraine is stronger than the average woman... - 10/06/2010 07:50:11 PM 1133 Views
How? - 10/06/2010 07:54:41 PM 1057 Views
I need to re-evaluate nothing! - 10/06/2010 07:46:20 PM 1058 Views
Think logically for a moment... - 10/06/2010 07:49:10 PM 893 Views
Who said Egwene is twice as strong as Moiraine? - 10/06/2010 07:52:27 PM 1140 Views
Aviendha did in FoH... - 10/06/2010 07:54:32 PM 885 Views
Nope! - 10/06/2010 07:55:55 PM 1057 Views
Your quotes are faulty - 10/06/2010 07:57:18 PM 1067 Views
In what sense though? - 10/06/2010 07:59:00 PM 1057 Views
Forkroot - 10/06/2010 08:04:50 PM 995 Views
Again... later that night? - 10/06/2010 08:05:39 PM 866 Views
What do you mean? - 10/06/2010 08:07:24 PM 1046 Views
See below... - 10/06/2010 08:11:24 PM 923 Views
Re: See below... - 10/06/2010 08:12:34 PM 993 Views
I just did. - 10/06/2010 08:16:09 PM 827 Views
Well then we disagree - 10/06/2010 08:18:10 PM 1028 Views
BUT WHAT ABOUT LATER IN THE NIGHT! - 10/06/2010 08:20:21 PM 867 Views
Ah, you mean later later ... - 10/06/2010 08:29:59 PM 968 Views
Forkroot wears off, you know? - 10/06/2010 08:45:33 PM 1061 Views
Yes I know - 10/06/2010 09:05:29 PM 1069 Views
I've explained it before in this thread... - 10/06/2010 09:17:10 PM 1047 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread... - 10/06/2010 09:37:39 PM 1038 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread... - 10/06/2010 09:51:40 PM 972 Views
Re: I've explained it before in this thread... - 10/06/2010 10:05:37 PM 999 Views
Are you sure you're feeling fine? - 10/06/2010 10:18:44 PM 1060 Views
Re: Are you sure you're feeling fine? - 10/06/2010 10:29:04 PM 1162 Views
Re: Are you sure you're feeling fine? - 10/06/2010 10:47:00 PM 961 Views
RJ writes that Amys cannot hold Egwene. BS writes that Barasene can. Who are you gonna believe? - 10/06/2010 08:31:35 PM 881 Views
It wasn't BS... both were RJ! - 10/06/2010 08:41:54 PM 966 Views
In that case, there is no problem... - 10/06/2010 08:45:05 PM 978 Views
But that isn't what the text says... - 10/06/2010 08:57:42 PM 839 Views
How can Egwene be strong enough to overcome Katerine and Silviana together then? - 10/06/2010 09:07:36 PM 1076 Views
She also says Egwene is Aes Sedai in the same sentence... - 10/06/2010 09:25:16 PM 1100 Views
Yeah, both were RJ - 10/06/2010 08:49:13 PM 949 Views
Yeah yeah... RJ lied, Maria lied. Only you make sense. I'm finished with this debate. - 10/06/2010 08:59:06 PM 1041 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:07:52 PM 1024 Views
Really? - 10/06/2010 09:29:22 PM 895 Views
Re: Really? - 10/06/2010 09:39:21 PM 1001 Views
Re: Really? - 10/06/2010 09:43:41 PM 883 Views
Re: Really? - 10/06/2010 09:50:23 PM 1047 Views
I haven't refuted? - 10/06/2010 09:53:17 PM 1073 Views
Here's what is clear: - 10/06/2010 09:02:41 PM 944 Views
IMO it's easy to disprove - 10/06/2010 09:22:23 PM 926 Views
Dude... - 10/06/2010 09:27:34 PM 833 Views
At least we agree on one thing - 10/06/2010 09:29:14 PM 944 Views
No... - 10/06/2010 09:32:06 PM 871 Views
Re: No... - 10/06/2010 09:43:59 PM 1024 Views
- 10/06/2010 09:57:25 PM 871 Views
Re: - 10/06/2010 10:12:29 PM 969 Views
Re: - 10/06/2010 10:34:28 PM 982 Views
Thought on this - 13/06/2010 01:09:29 PM 894 Views
Have to agree with Sidious on this point - 11/06/2010 02:49:58 AM 879 Views
That was kind of my point... - 11/06/2010 12:19:23 PM 609 Views
of course Katerine would have complained - 12/06/2010 12:53:31 PM 1000 Views
The rate forkroot wears off? - 16/06/2010 12:36:38 PM 958 Views
You missed that she isn't being given Forkroot at night at all! - 16/06/2010 04:47:59 PM 896 Views
Typos, screwed up what I meant - 17/06/2010 02:31:50 AM 905 Views
You are... - 17/06/2010 04:32:47 AM 1121 Views
Maria's other answer adresses this... - 10/06/2010 08:14:54 PM 776 Views
Then one Aes Sedai cannot shield her. But one did. - 10/06/2010 08:16:41 PM 902 Views
You can be much weaker than someone, and hold them shielded, if they are already cut off... - 10/06/2010 08:19:15 PM 876 Views
But, if you are much stronger, you can break that shield... - 10/06/2010 08:22:25 PM 893 Views
Easy... - 10/06/2010 08:24:59 PM 858 Views
What has that got to do with it? - 10/06/2010 08:32:56 PM 1045 Views
Amys is not LESS than half of Egwene's strength. You cannot hold someone if you are LESS than half.. - 10/06/2010 08:47:41 PM 958 Views
Amys is as strong as Moiraine, at the most one level lower. Barasine is weaker than Katarine, who... - 10/06/2010 09:00:26 PM 1087 Views
I can agree with that. - 10/06/2010 09:09:07 PM 845 Views
How can you agree with it? - 10/06/2010 09:13:55 PM 1044 Views
I'm thinking Berowin here... - 10/06/2010 09:16:41 PM 1050 Views
Exactly. - 10/06/2010 09:18:19 PM 905 Views
... - 10/06/2010 09:12:21 PM 824 Views
Agreed, but... - 10/06/2010 09:13:59 PM 1000 Views
Re: Agreed, but... - 10/06/2010 09:16:30 PM 797 Views
Good point... - 10/06/2010 09:18:53 PM 1010 Views
Or, you know, you're wrong? - 10/06/2010 09:27:55 PM 877 Views
Re: Good point... - 10/06/2010 09:28:02 PM 1084 Views
We've had this discussion before - 13/06/2010 01:59:34 PM 981 Views
Or, you know, you can have the grace to question your antiquated strength list... - 10/06/2010 09:22:51 PM 874 Views
The Bell Curve fits perfectly if one simple fact is true... - 10/06/2010 09:31:31 PM 831 Views
Or, you know, you can stop misinterpreting Aviendha... - 10/06/2010 09:40:05 PM 956 Views
I'd be perfectly happy to adjust my list if it made sense - 10/06/2010 09:32:35 PM 822 Views
Uhhh? - 10/06/2010 09:41:59 PM 819 Views
Re: Uhhh? - 10/06/2010 09:48:58 PM 821 Views
DUDE! - 10/06/2010 09:58:59 PM 852 Views
Re: DUDE! - 10/06/2010 10:09:11 PM 805 Views
I explained... - 10/06/2010 10:27:44 PM 836 Views
Re: I explained... - 10/06/2010 10:45:58 PM 954 Views
Rand seems to shield Egwene and Elayne TOGETHER, pretty easily... - 10/06/2010 09:54:03 PM 1425 Views
That's fairly simple, actually... - 10/06/2010 10:08:53 PM 1073 Views
Nope. Rand was also cut off from the Source when he broke a shield held by 3 Aes Sedai... - 10/06/2010 11:18:41 PM 1025 Views
Because that channeler is much stronger? I'm not getting your confusion here. *NM* - 10/06/2010 11:27:31 PM 494 Views
Your Aes Sedai are close to the average woman in strength, right... - 10/06/2010 11:42:01 PM 1086 Views
You are making a couple of mistakes - 13/06/2010 02:28:41 PM 945 Views
You're missing an important point... - 14/06/2010 11:10:55 PM 934 Views
Yes, what do you mean? You are actually proving our point... - 10/06/2010 08:10:50 PM 805 Views
No, here's the quote: I hate having to pull out my books with their yellowed pages... - 10/06/2010 08:01:54 PM 869 Views
Why would she need surprise against two? That was against five of them... - 10/06/2010 08:04:57 PM 884 Views
That makes no sense whatsoever... - 10/06/2010 08:06:53 PM 851 Views
Simply this... - 10/06/2010 08:13:42 PM 869 Views
Very poor evidence - 10/06/2010 08:11:26 PM 1003 Views
No it isn't... - 10/06/2010 08:18:09 PM 948 Views
Re: No it isn't... - 10/06/2010 08:32:17 PM 1023 Views
no she said Egwene is stronger than Amys and Melaine combined - 11/06/2010 12:46:29 AM 947 Views
The actual quote says Amys and Melaine combined... - 11/06/2010 12:25:07 PM 995 Views
Here's the problem with that... - 11/06/2010 12:42:41 PM 854 Views
Linked circles are more effective than individual channelers... - 11/06/2010 01:57:43 PM 953 Views
That much stronger? - 14/06/2010 11:06:18 PM 1011 Views
On this we agree. - 13/06/2010 02:34:45 PM 833 Views
I think you are misreading her. - 10/06/2010 07:47:06 PM 816 Views
Bingo *NM* - 10/06/2010 07:51:29 PM 582 Views
Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. *NM* - 10/06/2010 09:23:36 PM 533 Views
Re: Please explain what you mean by "channeler" and "power" distribution. - 10/06/2010 10:11:23 PM 1044 Views
I don't agree - 10/06/2010 07:49:41 PM 871 Views
BAH! Its infuriating how you have so many blinders... Eerily Aes Sedai of you. - 10/06/2010 07:54:23 PM 1009 Views
Hmm... - 10/06/2010 07:55:59 PM 786 Views
Because of the question to which she responded... - 10/06/2010 07:57:55 PM 821 Views
Re: Because of the question to which she responded... - 10/06/2010 08:06:16 PM 956 Views
Without contradicting the latter... - 10/06/2010 08:15:11 PM 855 Views
Ah well - 10/06/2010 08:20:32 PM 826 Views
Which is even more evidence... - 10/06/2010 08:23:28 PM 929 Views
Dude - 10/06/2010 08:30:57 PM 1036 Views
It isn't omission - 14/06/2010 10:54:47 PM 1009 Views
omg not this again *NM* - 10/06/2010 07:52:26 PM 966 Views
Great! Two of my OP strength ideas have been solidified! - 10/06/2010 07:39:53 PM 1077 Views
Nope... - 10/06/2010 07:46:31 PM 935 Views
Who said Cadsuane was 50? - 10/06/2010 07:51:14 PM 970 Views
So how can Egwene be twice as strong as Moiraine, if Moiraine is at 55? - 10/06/2010 07:53:11 PM 831 Views
She cannot be because she isn't. Silviana can shield Egwene alone, for God's sake. So can Amys! - 10/06/2010 07:56:26 PM 776 Views
Amys can't hold her properly - 10/06/2010 07:59:47 PM 811 Views
What about later that night? - 10/06/2010 08:02:16 PM 816 Views
No she didn't - 16/06/2010 03:02:21 PM 927 Views
No she didn't what? - 16/06/2010 04:46:05 PM 982 Views
Re: No she didn't what? - 17/06/2010 06:16:16 AM 818 Views
Re: No she didn't what? - 17/06/2010 06:02:57 PM 974 Views
you are arguing in a circle - 17/06/2010 06:31:19 PM 1297 Views
Why do you think it's a linear scale? - 16/06/2010 05:25:56 AM 943 Views
That's simple... - 16/06/2010 06:36:44 AM 895 Views
Re: That's simple... - 16/06/2010 12:27:07 PM 850 Views
Your concept is not mathematically right. So yeah, forget discussing it. - 16/06/2010 04:41:13 PM 1035 Views
Dang, Cyndane isn't using Cabriana's body. - 10/06/2010 08:25:20 PM 884 Views
But they didn't look alike anyway. *NM* - 10/06/2010 08:59:35 PM 582 Views
Eh, yeah. - 12/06/2010 08:24:10 PM 823 Views
The blue flash RAFO irritates me- I can't see how that will be relevant. The Min thing was new - 10/06/2010 08:50:52 PM 1016 Views
RJ already RAFOed the incident with Thom's knives/daggers before - 10/06/2010 08:57:52 PM 1100 Views
They RAFO way too much. - 11/06/2010 12:25:56 AM 815 Views
It isn't, unless she's implying the Creator helped him out or some other such thing - 11/06/2010 12:56:49 AM 846 Views
Just to make things clear on the strength thing... - 10/06/2010 09:08:02 PM 1126 Views
It is possible Maria was answering the first question and ignoring the second... - 10/06/2010 09:29:59 PM 854 Views
That still proves my point... - 10/06/2010 09:33:10 PM 1025 Views
Re: That still proves my point... - 10/06/2010 09:45:39 PM 881 Views
Then why... - 10/06/2010 10:00:00 PM 978 Views
Re: Then why... - 10/06/2010 10:07:56 PM 852 Views
God, what stupidity! - 10/06/2010 10:10:32 PM 842 Views
Re: God, what stupidity! - 10/06/2010 10:16:38 PM 945 Views
It doesn't have to be 1-100. - 10/06/2010 10:32:17 PM 895 Views
Re: It doesn't have to be 1-100. - 10/06/2010 10:41:02 PM 1167 Views
That's a mathematical impossibility... - 10/06/2010 11:26:23 PM 1003 Views
Just popping in. I think you're arguing over non-existent delineations. - 11/06/2010 12:44:40 AM 934 Views
You're pretty much agreeing with me, you know? - 11/06/2010 12:32:44 PM 900 Views
Yes. - 14/06/2010 10:31:00 PM 1011 Views
Re: Just to make things clear on the strength thing... - 14/06/2010 11:21:31 PM 1226 Views
Huh? - 14/06/2010 11:48:43 PM 820 Views
Also interesting... - 10/06/2010 09:38:27 PM 965 Views
I'm even more confused (parallel worlds and the Pattern) - 10/06/2010 09:48:17 PM 938 Views
Nah,... - 11/06/2010 11:38:20 AM 926 Views
Fascinating! - 13/06/2010 02:30:42 AM 943 Views
You know, these things always end up pissing me off. - 11/06/2010 12:25:05 AM 921 Views
I think she's saving that info for her WoT Encyclopedia. - 11/06/2010 12:54:38 AM 987 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off. - 11/06/2010 03:22:53 AM 1029 Views
Re: You know, these things always end up pissing me off. - 11/06/2010 12:29:37 PM 965 Views
I agree - 11/06/2010 01:14:36 PM 1076 Views
Re: I agree - 12/06/2010 03:02:32 PM 853 Views
BS didn't answer with "Read and find out" - 12/06/2010 03:28:05 PM 895 Views
We were speaking about Maria giving a RAFO on the topic, not Sanderson. *NM* - 13/06/2010 12:05:17 AM 510 Views
Actually she said "No"... *NM* - 13/06/2010 01:06:18 AM 606 Views
I agree with Jack and Sidious and not with you. - 11/06/2010 03:20:30 PM 993 Views
Well, on the Thom question... - 11/06/2010 08:25:09 AM 881 Views
Yeah - 11/06/2010 08:26:33 AM 987 Views
Re: Yeah - 15/06/2010 12:25:21 AM 841 Views
Eh, practically useless. - 14/06/2010 11:50:06 PM 842 Views
I agree. I think she is saving the good stuff for the encyclopedia. *NM* - 15/06/2010 04:17:07 PM 477 Views
Yeah. I do think she's taking advantage of these poor saps, though. - 17/06/2010 03:52:33 PM 1427 Views

Reply to Message