""I actually asked this next question after the signing but since it is relevant to this question I am putting it here. I asked has Demandreds alter ego been mentioned in the books but not seen? He gave me a very guarded look and said, That is a very well though out question, paused for a moment, and said " there have been to few characters introduced in the last few books for me to answer that. Speculators unite.""
Surely the above quote can only mean one thing. If Demandred's character had NOT been introduced in the last few books, then the fact that too FEW new characters have been introduced would in no way have made it difficult for BS to answer the question.
Surely the above quote can only mean one thing. If Demandred's character had NOT been introduced in the last few books, then the fact that too FEW new characters have been introduced would in no way have made it difficult for BS to answer the question.
Yes, it could have made it difficult: that answer would be a huge clue, either way.
If there haven't been many new additions, it means we have a small-ish pool of people who have been either (a) mentioned but stayed offscreen or (b) appeared onscreen. And BS had already said that there's been no appearance as of KoD.
BS might not want to eliminate all of one group or another right then and there. Hell, I wouldn't want to if I were him either. If he removed one group, the remaining number of characters would become unacceptably manageable for all those forum-kids on their kooky internets. They'd figure it out and send the information all through the interweb pipes.
The only reason why the SMALL number of new characters would make it a problem for BS to answer, is if Demandred is indeed one of these newly introduced characters.
RPA said what I said, but 7 months ago. Funny enough, it was an Etzel post that was the key then too. Look at the bottom of RPA's message: http://www.readandfindout.com/wheeloftime/messageboard/59740/
You may be right that it is someone in TGS, but you focus too much on the answer instead of the question. I initially thought "duh, Taim," and then, "mmm, cookies." Before we had our suspect list narrowed to TGS and after, I assumed it could be Logain or Dobraine. I also thought Rodel might be a proxy - until we saw his PoV. Now my money's on Roedran.
I really wanted to consider the Dragonsworn and WC to be his combined armies (or 2 of 3+ proxies). Yet I'm uncertain on their current numbers now (due to Masema's downfall and Galad's rise), and they both may be too small for big D's move. I liked it because of the meetings between the Seanchan & DS, as well as some of the AS's approach to Masema. It seemed to reflect 2/3rds of the Forsaken's Trio, so it would be a motif.
That Taraboner you mentioned might be right too.
I'd also considered that he could be someone on mainland Seanchan. Unfortunately, it seems like pro/con arguments are too weak... If Demmy, Semi, and Messy work together, it makes sense that Semi plunges Seanchan territory into chaos, then Demmy gets a hold of the army remaining there. It sounds like a nifty and clever move, with a promise of some nice Sean-on-Sean action. Randland is all united, moving towards the last battle, glad to have raken working as scouts with Aes Sedai... Then Rand, Eggy, Tuon, Perrin, and Mat see big gateways form, with some odd Seanchan geological feature behind massive armies coming straight at them.
But it probably isn't too plausible. That sort of move, with such a big power base for Demmy, would prolly take real time to set up. It sounds like a big plan, not a spur-of-the-moment one. Semi clearly had intended to control Tuon. And then she tried to make Suroth take the throne. And, of course, it would be silly for the Trio to not have control over 3 separate territories.
This message last edited by newyorkersedai on 07/06/2010 at 01:19:00 AM
Signing reports
06/06/2010 07:30:37 PM
- 2008 Views
Interesting
06/06/2010 07:41:56 PM
- 1074 Views
BS said Demandred's identity is the greatest secret in the story, and will pay off in the end...
06/06/2010 08:05:51 PM
- 1293 Views
militarily perhaps, but not a duel
07/06/2010 04:56:55 AM
- 1067 Views
Re: militarily perhaps, but not a duel
07/06/2010 01:34:04 PM
- 862 Views
Re: militarily perhaps, but not a duel
07/06/2010 04:17:26 PM
- 937 Views
Oh I like the villains to lose everything before they die
07/06/2010 04:18:43 PM
- 844 Views
Bah
07/06/2010 04:38:36 PM
- 947 Views
Skilled Rand would be nice.
07/06/2010 09:24:56 PM
- 776 Views
I'd rather see Aviendha and Elayne link and take her out
07/06/2010 09:41:47 PM
- 773 Views
Re: I'd rather see Aviendha and Elayne link and take her out
07/06/2010 10:00:44 PM
- 908 Views
You are quite right, I should have said "kill all the remaining FS"
07/06/2010 10:08:49 PM
- 927 Views
Re: You are quite right, I should have said "kill all the remaining FS"
07/06/2010 10:22:11 PM
- 825 Views
Moridin IMO will be all Rand's to deal with
07/06/2010 10:56:28 PM
- 758 Views
I think Demandred might be...
07/06/2010 09:48:29 AM
- 884 Views
I favor the Roederan theory
07/06/2010 01:35:37 PM
- 895 Views
I have this feeling that Elaida is going to surprise us, and Demandred is in Caemlyn...
06/06/2010 08:33:16 PM
- 1044 Views
Meh. I think Elaida will end up like other women in the series who sucked
06/06/2010 10:56:47 PM
- 934 Views
While Traveling is certainly a tactical advantage, I think the Seanchan won't be able to use it.
06/06/2010 11:15:56 PM
- 824 Views
A hundred gateways next to each other is as good as one giant gateway...
06/06/2010 11:36:48 PM
- 936 Views
but no carts or wagons.
07/06/2010 12:15:29 AM
- 944 Views
Fully supplied armies could be moved
07/06/2010 02:45:15 AM
- 926 Views
you are missing the point that this would create several major problems
07/06/2010 01:49:08 PM
- 893 Views
Advantages and Disadvantages to both large and small gateways
08/06/2010 03:04:28 AM
- 893 Views
The logistics would be practically impossible, as even RJ stated (see quote below)
08/06/2010 01:41:03 PM
- 874 Views
But the Seanchan have an advantage the Perrin did not...
07/06/2010 02:45:26 AM
- 942 Views
Re: But the Seanchan have an advantage the Perrin did not...
07/06/2010 01:52:40 PM
- 907 Views
Re: But the Seanchan have an advantage the Perrin did not...
07/06/2010 06:55:59 PM
- 751 Views
Re: But the Seanchan have an advantage the Perrin did not...
07/06/2010 07:03:29 PM
- 851 Views
Re: But the Seanchan have an advantage the Perrin did not...
07/06/2010 07:48:01 PM
- 768 Views
We have no clue if Damane can tie off weaves
07/06/2010 08:28:08 PM
- 851 Views
Re: We have no clue if Damane can tie off weaves
07/06/2010 09:22:24 PM
- 905 Views
One disagreement
07/06/2010 09:33:09 PM
- 879 Views
I agree...but
07/06/2010 09:44:54 PM
- 803 Views
That's just it ... Egwene, Elayne and Rand have already thought of it and considered the uses
07/06/2010 10:04:50 PM
- 907 Views
Egwene to pass information? You're joking, right?
07/06/2010 10:59:25 PM
- 942 Views
Not to mention...
07/06/2010 09:26:28 PM
- 856 Views
Re: Not to mention...
07/06/2010 09:38:31 PM
- 796 Views
yes, but the cost may prove too high to allocate so many resources against Traveling
07/06/2010 09:44:16 PM
- 773 Views
If they get Traveling, I hope we read the first time the Seanchan move their "creatures" through
07/06/2010 06:22:47 PM
- 732 Views
Re: If they get Traveling, I hope we read the first time the Seanchan move their "creatures" through
07/06/2010 11:03:22 PM
- 856 Views
The little thing is Rand's angreal IMO
07/06/2010 04:52:17 AM
- 803 Views
I think the thing from books 4-6 has to do with dreaming/TAR abilities.
08/06/2010 12:09:53 AM
- 794 Views
I think BS has inadvertently given away a massive clue regarding Demandred's identity...
06/06/2010 09:12:58 PM
- 994 Views
What's to prevent him from hiding as a female? *NM*
06/06/2010 10:30:08 PM
- 379 Views
Forgive me if I don't give that possibility serious consideration.
06/06/2010 10:36:20 PM
- 808 Views
Bc it's clearly way too dissatisfying. And Demmy's certainly too proud to hide as a woman! *NM*
07/06/2010 01:01:52 AM
- 448 Views
You misread, IMO
07/06/2010 12:59:58 AM
- 946 Views
Well. Galgan, then. *NM*
07/06/2010 04:05:57 PM
- 438 Views
Can't be Galgan
07/06/2010 04:37:36 PM
- 772 Views
galgan's out, but maybe...
07/06/2010 07:01:12 PM
- 762 Views
Or...
08/06/2010 09:37:21 AM
- 775 Views
I doubt the new Taraboner king is involved
08/06/2010 12:52:45 PM
- 1102 Views
As I said, I think...
08/06/2010 01:30:39 PM
- 777 Views
I'm not disagreeing with most of it
08/06/2010 01:49:54 PM
- 765 Views
look above, you guys agreed on stuff for 19 hours. New record? *NM*
08/06/2010 04:12:47 PM
- 372 Views