Active Users:537 Time:15/11/2024 05:51:03 AM
? Yes, I am aware of this Isaac Send a noteboard - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM
It say's it's not from LTT memories... It was from Rand's, and he seen Justice in book 2.


IT doesn't mean it isn't LTT's just because of that, he could have seen a picture of it during his studies. Besides, the 'oddly enough' remark implies he'd think it was something LTT might know too. Rand doesn't say things like 'oddly enough' regarding his normal memories. If Justice was not power-wrought, then it would probably be a rusted heap of garbage after a thousand years of being lost, if it was power-wrought it would have had an AoL owner, that could have been LTT. I could easily see Almasan having a sword he claimed was LTT's and Hawkwing taking it for his own as a trophy. Then Rand and LTT both remember it, Rand from Falme.
The intuitive mind is a sacred gift and the rational mind is a faithful servant. We have created a society that honors the servant and has forgotten the gift.
- Albert Einstein

King of Cairhien 20-7-2
Chancellor of the Landsraad, Archduke of Is'Mod
Reply to message
Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 04:25:12 PM 1166 Views
Re: Plot relevance of the sword - 06/09/2009 05:40:07 PM 650 Views
Great - 06/09/2009 08:01:07 PM 667 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 04:02:53 AM 585 Views
Re: Great - 07/09/2009 11:53:52 PM 586 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 12:12:26 AM 645 Views
doubt it - 08/09/2009 01:16:23 AM 641 Views
Re: doubt it - 10/09/2009 07:36:38 PM 595 Views
Ockham's Razor - 08/09/2009 03:25:59 AM 565 Views
You can't use real world facts on a WoT character! - 08/09/2009 04:56:25 AM 615 Views
Re: Great - 08/09/2009 10:57:13 PM 715 Views
Thoughts on Justice - 09/09/2009 01:48:10 AM 596 Views
I see that differently - 09/09/2009 02:15:45 AM 554 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:24:55 PM 526 Views
Re: I see that differently - 09/09/2009 05:52:56 PM 634 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 04:42:57 AM 528 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 02:53:56 PM 504 Views
Re: I see that differently - 10/09/2009 06:49:36 PM 586 Views
Maybe we're just reading it wrong - 09/09/2009 05:05:35 AM 720 Views
Well... - 09/09/2009 03:59:27 PM 648 Views
I like this idea very much. The only question is... - 06/09/2009 09:10:57 PM 587 Views
Nice - 07/09/2009 02:46:36 AM 574 Views
Re: Nice - 07/09/2009 04:00:53 AM 587 Views
? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 04:24:03 AM 539 Views
Re: ? Yes, I am aware of this - 07/09/2009 03:36:45 PM 528 Views
My early theory: High Lord Turak - 08/09/2009 08:11:24 PM 1027 Views
All good points but a couple of puzzlers - 09/09/2009 02:06:59 AM 611 Views
see above for part - 09/09/2009 02:20:19 AM 565 Views
OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 12:14:10 PM 514 Views
Re: OK, I see what you are getting at, but I'm not sure I buy it - 09/09/2009 02:59:30 PM 566 Views
No, He's giving me way more than I want. - 09/09/2009 05:27:31 PM 529 Views
But is it...? - 09/09/2009 10:00:40 PM 617 Views
Well the point of the original poster - 10/09/2009 02:05:05 AM 602 Views
Additionally, re: Why the Dragons? - 09/09/2009 03:08:27 PM 566 Views
Not sure - 09/09/2009 05:37:53 PM 545 Views
We'll find out I guess - 09/09/2009 07:26:58 PM 555 Views
Additionally, re: "it felt right...." - 09/09/2009 02:47:39 AM 521 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 05:29:11 PM 595 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 09/09/2009 06:05:43 PM 643 Views
Re: My early theory: High Lord Turak - 10/09/2009 04:46:21 AM 628 Views
No Way! - 09/09/2009 07:33:14 PM 562 Views

Reply to Message