Active Users:321 Time:06/04/2025 02:04:31 AM
I thought they served a purpose in Ebu Dar djwilson300 Send a noteboard - 03/06/2010 11:16:49 PM
The windfinders played a significant role both in exposing what life for the mainlander channelers would be like chained, and creating a valid diversion for the entire Matt vs Tuon thread. I think the entire "bargain" turned out to be a fizzled plotline when the net result was spoiled food for the Domani and not much else. I can only hope when the last battle begins, the Sea Folk are called upon again to do something more productive. (Whats not to like about them...topless graceful women who have the best balance of power with the opposite sex than any other culture in the world...sign me up)
Reply to message
Are the Sea Folk important? - 03/06/2010 04:35:17 PM 1089 Views
Double post - Ignore *NM* - 03/06/2010 08:13:43 PM 260 Views
Re: Are the Sea Folk important? - 03/06/2010 08:13:43 PM 766 Views
I thought they served a purpose in Ebu Dar - 03/06/2010 11:16:49 PM 792 Views
Oh right, the Amayar thing... hope Sanderson's careful about stuff like that. - 04/06/2010 01:41:53 AM 726 Views
Agreed - 04/06/2010 04:39:08 AM 642 Views
Oceanic shadowspawn - 04/06/2010 01:44:51 PM 704 Views
Re: Agreed - 04/06/2010 05:26:21 PM 597 Views
yes, actually that makes sense - 04/06/2010 09:43:45 PM 559 Views
Not as important as your mom is to me. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:20:03 AM 358 Views
Not as important as your mom is to me. Oops, Double post. MY BAD. *NM* - 04/06/2010 03:20:04 AM 241 Views
Is it just me or did a bunch of double posts go missing? - 04/06/2010 10:50:09 PM 513 Views
Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 03:11:19 PM 581 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 04:51:24 PM 799 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 04/06/2010 06:58:05 PM 582 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 05/06/2010 04:53:27 AM 579 Views
Re: Rand has a navy now. A powerful Navy. - 05/06/2010 05:53:43 AM 536 Views
Seanchan transport numbers - 05/06/2010 08:58:31 AM 534 Views

Reply to Message