Active Users:345 Time:02/04/2025 02:00:43 AM
I agree Camilla Send a noteboard - 30/05/2010 09:44:57 PM
it has always seemed obvious to me. More importantly, it is the only elegant solution. I will be very disappointed if it turns out to have been Graendal, and not only because I will have been wrong all these years.
*MySmiley*
structured procrastinator
Reply to message
I am determined to prove, before it's revealed, that Lanfear killed Asmodean. - 26/05/2010 05:36:59 AM 1205 Views
It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 09:17:06 AM 882 Views
Re: It's unlikely - 26/05/2010 02:04:08 PM 844 Views
Well... - 26/05/2010 03:09:38 PM 832 Views
A few points - 26/05/2010 03:50:12 PM 627 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:07:15 PM 700 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 04:23:39 PM 695 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:26:27 PM 675 Views
Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 06:00:55 PM 744 Views
Re: Actually I believe... - 26/05/2010 07:04:51 PM 739 Views
I think... - 26/05/2010 07:35:16 PM 663 Views
Re: I think... - 26/05/2010 07:47:19 PM 605 Views
IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 07:55:47 PM 312 Views
Re: IMO, the difference is that Ishy was strongly connected to the DO, when he died in TAR. - 26/05/2010 08:25:36 PM 626 Views
But Ishy channeled the TP; thus the DO was more aware of him in TAR. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:33:45 PM 277 Views
I don't see how that really makes a difference - 26/05/2010 08:43:58 PM 650 Views
At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. *NM* - 26/05/2010 08:46:44 PM 289 Views
Re: At least Asmo didn't channel the TP, when he died; this could be the difference to Ishy. - 26/05/2010 09:23:10 PM 614 Views
Well, the TP is not related to who killed Asmo, in my view - 26/05/2010 09:34:42 PM 669 Views
That doesn't make sense - 26/05/2010 09:40:10 PM 636 Views
That has nothing to do with the identity of the killer. - 26/05/2010 09:56:18 PM 582 Views
I still think you are making this more convluted than it needs to be - 26/05/2010 10:21:26 PM 651 Views
You confuse two things... - 27/05/2010 09:46:56 AM 566 Views
But your theory completely relies on this thought - 27/05/2010 11:48:48 AM 589 Views
I argue... - 27/05/2010 12:20:09 PM 750 Views
we don't know any of that until WH - 27/05/2010 12:49:53 PM 732 Views
I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 12:59:06 PM 625 Views
Re: I cite your statement a few posts above... - 27/05/2010 01:14:51 PM 647 Views
Thanks! - 26/05/2010 07:12:01 PM 621 Views
Re: A few points - 26/05/2010 05:55:27 PM 684 Views
I think you are grasping a little - 26/05/2010 07:11:36 PM 681 Views
Re: Well... - 26/05/2010 04:15:42 PM 716 Views
I know... - 26/05/2010 07:54:03 PM 675 Views
Re: I know... - 26/05/2010 11:58:13 PM 557 Views
Re: I know... - 27/05/2010 09:41:20 AM 722 Views
graendal - 26/05/2010 11:57:04 PM 603 Views
I'm 80% sure it's Graendal, with 20% left over for Moghedien - 26/05/2010 02:00:09 PM 658 Views
Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:17:57 PM 643 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 02:26:23 PM 667 Views
Re: Moghedien would be quite the trick - 26/05/2010 03:06:49 PM 669 Views
Yep. More impressive than the guy who was killed by a shepherd, right? =) - 27/05/2010 03:44:07 PM 618 Views
Maybe she did it, but you misjudge Lanfear bigtime, I think - 26/05/2010 07:12:09 PM 671 Views
Aviendha(sp) done it *NM* - 26/05/2010 09:20:11 PM 326 Views
I agree - 30/05/2010 09:44:57 PM 830 Views

Reply to Message